But that doesn’t mean I want to throw those stories away.

At some point, I started thinking of them as Deep Estate “Monster of the Week” episodes: Smaller cases that could explore different anomalies, characters, time periods, and corners of the world without needing to justify their existence as a full 400-page novel.

Eventually I decided: Fuck it. Don’t write the next novel. Write an anthology.

The best parts of The Witcher series are easily the short stories where Geralt is actually doing his damn job as a Witcher, and The Deep Estate is uniquely suited to the same kind of format.

So I started writing what I’m now calling The Deep Estate Case Files: a series of interconnected standalone stories that I’ll be publishing on a semi-regular basis before eventually collecting them into a full anthology.

And the first one is finished.

VIBE HOUND

A 120-page novella, available September 29th on Kindle and in paperback. Pre-order it HERE.

Kindle: September 29
Paperback: September 29
Audiobook: TBD

Plot Synopsis

Some cases are so strange, reality denies they ever happened.

When an unknown outbreak tears through a university library, the Bureau of the Bizarre finds itself facing an entirely new nightmare: an Anomalous Meme.

Seven letters. Two words. A single thought, and it’s all over.

Simply hearing the meme is enough to infect someone, turning them into a self-mutilating monster compelled to repeat the same dangerous phrase over and over again.

The infection is spreading, and containment won’t last forever. If the Meme goes viral, it could spell the end of the entire world.

It’s up to Agent John Doe, the Collectors’ resident Vibe Hound, to identify the source of the outbreak before it’s too late.

Vibe Hound is the first novella in The Deep Estate Case Files and the third entry in the darkly comic cosmic sci-fi horror turducken that is The Deep Estate.

And Vibe Hound is just the first case.

Coming Soon…ish:

B.O.B. Noire

(What I’m currently writing)

A slow week in the office sends John and Carrie down a rabbit hole after they discover one hell of a story buried in the Collectors’ Archives.

It’s 1933. Agent Joe Dempsey is investigating a string of shootings in speakeasies across the Windy City when he finds himself caught in the middle of a war between the Chicago Mafia and a femme fatale who refuses to die.

Too Many Crooks

Why is a tennis ball that waits half a second before deciding physics applies to it one of the most vital anomalous objects the Deep Estate could possibly obtain?

How does acquiring it result in a three-way firefight between John Doe, the Yakuza, and the Amish?

Let’s find out.

Boogeyman

There is a monster under your bed.

And it’s crawling out at night, dragging children into the Backrooms.

It’s up to Agent Jacob Schmidt, John Doe’s father, to go in after them and bring them back.

STAY TUNED. More Case Files, updates, and sneak peeks are on the way.

For years, Zack Snyder fans have perplexed clinical psychologists, displaying traits that went beyond their peculiar taste in movies yet stubbornly refused to fit within existing diagnostic criteria.

“I noticed something was wrong during Barbenheimer,” said 29-year-old Snyder fan Mike Allen. “I saw Oppenheimer first, loved it, then watched Barbie and wanted to gouge my eyes out. I ran out of the theater and spent the rest of the weekend watching Justice League on repeat, rocking back and forth. I thought something was wrong with me.”

“My colleagues and I kept coming across patients we couldn’t explain,” said psychiatrist Dr. Elaine Cho. “It was like they had autism, if autism dressed like Guy Fieri, and ADHD, if ADHD were narrated by Werner Herzog.”

After a decade of research, the American Psychiatric Association announced Friday that Snyder fans will finally receive their own diagnostic category in the DSM: Snyder Processing Disorder, or SPD.

The defining breakthrough came when researchers studied the intense online backlash to James Gunn’s Superman.

“Here we had the same hero presented in two vastly different ways,” Cho explained. “The Snyder-fan reaction was so uniformly negative that we realized we had stumbled onto Zack Snyder’s complete antithesis.”

Patients are now diagnosed with SPD by placing them along the Gunn-Snyder Spectrum, with more severe cases clustering almost entirely at the Snyder end.

By far, SPD’s most recognizable sensory trait is difficulty processing action presented at conventional speed.

“Much like dyslexic people were wrongly assumed to be slow readers, Snyder fans have been similarly dismissed,” Cho explained. “We’ve found that those with SPD struggle to process fast visual events in real time. A neurotypical viewer sees a punch occur in half a second and understands what happened. An SPD viewer needs at least nine seconds of slow-motion movement to truly absorb cause and effect.”

Auditory testing revealed a similar pattern.

“It’s like the movie is pulling my eyeballs one way and the soundtrack is pulling my ears in the complete opposite direction,” said SPD patient Kyle Branson, abruptly turning off Guardians of the Galaxy.

“Unlike patients whose sensory issues involve volume or intensity, people with SPD are perfectly comfortable with loud noises,” Cho explained. “Distorted guitars, pounding drums, an Icelandic woman wailing over an explosion—they love all of that. What they struggle with is recognizable lyrics.”

In one experiment, a subject became agitated while watching an Aquaman fight scene set to Dolly Parton’s “9 to 5.”

“He kept demanding to know whether he was supposed to listen to the song or watch the movie,” said visual-processing researcher Dr. Marcus Bell.

The same subject was later shown altered footage of Captain America lifting a concrete slab set to “God Dragging a Refrigerator Across Heaven (Epic Mix)” from the Sucker Punch soundtrack and immediately relaxed.

Another sensory component of SPD appears to be heightened chromatic sensitivity, with patients consistently preferring the muted grays, blues, and browns generally found on a 4K television contemplating suicide. Conversely, saturated colors tended to produce feelings of overstimulation, confusion, and complaints that a film “looks like fucking Marvel.”

“The average person sees Superman’s bright red cape and thinks, ‘Superman,’” Bell explained. “A Snyder-processing brain thinks, ‘Why is Superman screaming at me?’”

One of SPD’s defining traits appears to be a cognitive preference for clearly established roles and strict tonal consistency. Heroes should behave heroically. Villains should act like villains.

“Neurotypical audiences tend to view characterization as flexible,” Cho continued. “A grim character can occasionally be lighthearted. A comedic character can have tragic moments. That’s not the case with SPD.”

Comedic elements, in particular, are only acceptable when safely quarantined inside a comedy.

“In the same way My Little Pony became unexpectedly popular among autistic audiences, the Venn diagram between Zack Snyder fans and Dane Cook fans appears to be almost a perfect circle,” Cho explained. “They feel safe laughing because they know he’s not suddenly going to get serious or say anything of substance.”

“Dude, I love Step Brothers,” Branson said when asked about his favorite comedy. “Everybody in that movie is funny because they know it’s a funny movie. But Deadpool? God, that guy is annoying.”

Branson became visibly uncomfortable when researchers asked whether Batman could make a joke.

“What? No! No way! God, no!”

When asked why, Branson stared silently at the wall.

“Because he’s Batman. Batman is Batman because his parents died. You don’t joke after that. Ever.”

Branson began banging rhythmically on the table.

“Never-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever.”

“Shoot, he’s stimming,” Cho said.

The session was cut short, and Matt Reeves’s The Batman was put on to calm Branson down.

Researchers say this rigid categorical thinking may finally explain why one of the most mocked scenes in Snyder’s filmography consistently resonates with his most devoted fans.

“In Batman v Superman, Batman abandons his murderous vendetta against Superman after learning that Superman’s mother is also named Martha,” Cho explained. “For years, viewers dismissed the moment as contrived, but we believe it may actually represent an unusually efficient form of SPD categorical cognition.”

“By a Snyder fan’s reasoning, Batman has Superman filed under ‘ALIEN.’ Aliens are ‘NOT HUMAN,’ and anything not human is automatically filed under ‘THREAT.’”

Cho gestured to two flowcharts, one representing neurotypical thought processes and the other those of people with SPD.

“When Superman tells Batman, ‘Save Martha,’ a neurotypical brain immediately starts spiraling. They think, ‘What? Who calls their mother by her first name? A normal person would say, “Save my mom.” Oh my God, I’ve been watching this conflict for two hours and its entire resolution hinges on the fact that Superman’s mom is named Martha? What if his mom were named Jane? Would Batman just kill Superman right there? In what world does that make sense?’”

Cho moved her finger down the SPD flowchart.

“But in a Snyder-processing brain, the shared name becomes a revelation that creates an empathic bridge. Through Batman’s POV, they see the logic as: ‘My mom is named Martha. Superman’s mother is named Martha. And if I’m a good guy and my mother is named Martha, then Superman must be a good guy too because his mother is also named Martha. We should be friends.’”

Cho nodded.

“For an SPD viewer, that’s not lazy writing. That’s an extremely satisfying database update.”

The addition of SPD to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders has prompted major streaming services to begin testing Snyder Cuts as an accessibility feature alongside subtitles, audio description, and sign-language interpretation. When activated, the Snyder Cut automatically desaturates the image, slows significant action moments, removes disruptive humor, and replaces any lyrical songs with Evanescence.

So far, the results have been promising.

“So many of the people we thought were toxic fans were just unrepresented SPD viewers,” said James Gunn. “Now that they’re able to watch the Snyder Cut of Supergirl, they’re actually going back and updating their reviews.”

The technology could eventually make thousands of films far more accessible to SPD audiences. After his traumatic Barbenheimer experience, Mike Allen watched the Snyder Cut of Barbie, which replaces most of the pink with gunmetal gray and replaces every musical number with Mongolian throat singing, and was relieved to find the film “finally watchable.”

“And you know what?” Allen said, considering the film. “I think… I think I finally understand feminism now.”

Male viewers of the Snyder Cut of Obsession also reported dramatic improvements in comprehension thanks to additional footage designed to eliminate any moral ambiguity.

“The first time I watched Obsession, I came away thinking Bear was just kind of a pitiful dude trapped in this really crazy situation. I actually thought the wish was the whole problem,” said 31-year-old SPD patient Darren Cole. “Then I watched the Snyder Cut, and the moment he makes the wish, the movie stops completely so the director can look straight into the camera and say, ‘Bear is a bad guy and a rapist.’”

Cole sighed in relief.

“Man, it made all the difference. All the women in my office have finally started talking to me again.”

The addition of Snyder Processing Disorder has prompted researchers to investigate whether other intense fandoms may represent previously unrecognized neurocognitive profiles.

Wes Anderson Syndrome is increasingly looking like a condition previously thought to be obsessive-compulsive disorder, only pastel and at a weird aspect ratio.

Several institutes are also investigating Cronenbergitus, a condition in which patients struggle to express technological anxiety, sexual repression, or existential dread unless it grows teeth and emerges from their abdomen.

Lynchian Emotional Disorder is the most likely contender for official DSM recognition and is defined as a condition in which patients experience distress if reality fails to operate on dream logic. Early trials have found that patients are vastly more comfortable in social situations set to off-key Muzak and show significant improvement when an emotional-support midget is allowed to silently dance in the corner of the room.

WASHINGTON, D.C.— Decades of conservative policy abruptly snapped into focus Monday after President Donald Trump was asked about universal pre-K and accidentally explained the philosophical foundation of the entire Republican Party.

“Universal? For everybody?” Trump asked, visibly confused by the premise. “You can’t do everybody. There’s too many people, and I like the way it is. You take care of the winners and ignore the losers. Losers don’t get pre-K. Frankly, we don’t need more winners. We need less losers. A whole lot less. A lot of these problems would be much easier.”

Across the country, millions of Americans reportedly froze in place.

“Ohhh,” said Cincinnati resident Mark Rollins, slowly lowering his coffee as nearly forty years of conservative politics suddenly became comprehensible. “Holy shit. That explains everything.”

Within minutes, GOP lawmakers began openly embracing what strategists are calling the Too Many Losers Doctrine, or simply TML, abandoning any tortured attempt to explain Republican policy.

“It’s just so liberating,” said Senator Ted Cruz, wiping away tears. “You have no idea how hard it is to explain why taking healthcare away from 20 million losers is actually good for America. Now, I can just say ‘TML.’”

Cruz took a deep breath and smiled. “But yeah. A whole lot of people are going to die.”

“Everyone asks why the richest country can’t afford the things most other nations figured out decades ago,” explained Heritage Foundation fellow Robert Keene. “The mistake is assuming that we’re actually trying to. The free market will sort things out—It sorts things out.”

Asked what exactly was being sorted, Keene cleared his throat. “The people. Specifically, the number of them.”

TML has also changed Americans’ understanding of Trump’s signature slogan, “Make America Great Again.”

“‘Great’ was when there were fewer people,” explained conservative commentator Sean Hannity. “In 1950, the United States population was roughly half what it is today. You could park anywhere. Let’s get back to that.”

Top White House officials are also using the Too Many Losers Doctrine to frame the current state of the economy.

“It’s not inflation; it’s demand outpacing supply, and America is naturally embracing the Disney model,” said Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick. “I mean, just look at Disneyland. Higher prices mean fewer losers, and suddenly everything is better. Shorter lines. More churros. Nobody from Honduras. I mean, have you been recently? Of course you haven’t. And that’s kind of the whole point.”

For the 45% of parents with children who go into debt to pay for a Disney vacation, the comment was a revelation.

“CALL ME CRAZY,” yelled Matthew Cook, a three-time Trump voter from Texas and next-door neighbor to a roaring data center, “BUT I’M STARTING TO THINK I’M A LOSER.”

“You’re all future winners. You’re just not winning yet,” said Mississippi Senator Roger Wicker, representing the poorest state in the nation, when asked how one becomes a winner in America.

“So we’re currently losers?” asked one horrified resident.

“No, you’re fans,” Wicker said. “Like when our… team wins, you know, in football, the…” He snapped his fingers, searching for the name. “Shoot. Whatever. The point is, when your local football team wins, you don’t actually win. But you sure helped them win by cheering them on.”

Wicker paused.

“What the hell is our team called?”

An aide whispered in his ear that Mississippi does not have an NFL team.

Wicker frowned. “We’re that poor? Goddamn. What a bunch of losers.”

“Too many people think the American Dream is supposed to be a standard. I mean, in this economy?” explained podcaster and Lacoste polo shirt that wished he were a real boy, Tucker Carlson. “The beauty of TML is that everyone can believe they, too, can someday be a winner for zero dollars. You just gotta, you know, pull yourself up by your bootstraps, keep doing what the winning class says, and maybe some of their winning will trickle down onto you.”

He shrugged. “And if it doesn’t work out for most people? Fuck ’em. They were losers. But not you, listener. You’re a winner, and winners use daily NutMaxxx supplements to combat Low-T.”

Many Republican voters are beginning to realize that past conservative pushes may have been targeting them.

“Wait a minute,” said Florida Republican Rick Harmon. “When COVID started, they said we couldn’t shut businesses down just to stop some silly cough…”

He paused, his jaw dropping in revelation. “They convinced us masks were pointless. Then they kept telling us not to trust the vaccine!”

Harmon gasped and turned to his wife. “It wasn’t about herd immunity at all. They were trying to thin the herd!”

His eyes slowly narrowed. “Oh, those motherfuckers.”

WASHINGTON, D.C.— Investigative journalist Ronan Farrow has reportedly spent the past six days sitting in a folding chair outside the apartment of 35-year-old Trump aide Natalie Harp, patiently waiting for the moment she is finally ready to tell the world the horrors she’s endured.

Farrow has assured Harp there is “absolutely no pressure,” periodically sliding his business card beneath her door and reminding her that The New Yorker has already cleared space for 12,000 words and the deadline is fast approaching.

Harp, who serves as executive assistant to President Donald Trump, has repeatedly insisted that nothing inappropriate has happened, is happening, or will ever happen, which sparked a vigorous online discourse about the severity of her trauma from all the things that have obviously happened.

“‘Believe All Women’ means we should take any woman coming forward with reports of sexual assault and harassment seriously,” said one person on X. “But when Natalie Harp says Trump hasn’t digitally penetrated her with those bruised, meaty paws of his? No, I don’t believe her. I don’t believe her at all.”

Many users echoed the same sentiment, arguing, “She’s blonde, and it’s Trump. Come on.”

CNN spent much of Friday speculating about her nickname, “The Human Printer.”

“Anyone who owns an HP printer knows the trauma of a one-sided toxic relationship,” said Van Jones. “I shudder to think what he’s doing to her to earn that name.”

The parallels to the Monica Lewinsky scandal proved impossible for MSNBC to resist, despite the absence of a scandal. Simply having Monica Lewinsky, however, proved more than enough.

“All I will say is that I know what happened when I was alone in the Oval Office with the President of the United States,” Monica Lewinsky said via Zoom on Rachel Maddow. “Need I say more?”

At which point, Fox News switched to wall-to-wall coverage that “Monica Lewinsky has more to say,” hoping to change the subject to the 28-year-old affair.

Yesterday, Time’s Up, a prominent anti-sexual-harassment and women’s advocacy organization, issued a press release saying, “Trump is the President of the United States. Harp is his employee. The power imbalance is impossible to ignore. We take all allegations seriously and find the complete lack of allegations enough to warrant a thorough investigation. At the minimum, there’s been some Biden-style hair sniffing.”

As Harp left for work this morning, Ronan Farrow could be seen calling out, “Denial is often part of the process, but we’re here for you! Whether it’s a Pulitzer-winning tell-all, a New York Times bestseller, or even a podcast series with a future Netflix adaptation.”

Public polling suggests most Americans have already adopted a broadly sympathetic view of Harp. Unsurprisingly, those who find no issue with Harp’s exploitation are Trump’s steadfast MAGA base, Bill Cosby, and Harvey Weinstein.

Even routine footage of Harp performing her job has become increasingly difficult for viewers to watch.

“I saw her hand him an article yesterday,” said Pennsylvania voter Denise Waller. “He didn’t even thank her. And then she just stood there, smiling. I just wanted to reach through the television and drag her somewhere safe. There are shelters, honey. I will take you there personally.”

“Natalie is an accomplished professional who has never alleged misconduct of any kind,” said a White House spokesperson, brazenly enabling the continued exploitation and human trafficking of another woman trapped within Trump’s orbit.

“I am not being exploited, and I am not being trafficked,” Harp later said when asked for comment. She then clarified, “Except for the one time they shoved me in the trunk of that SUV. Or that time they stuffed me in that catering truck. Also that week I spent sleeping in a Bedminster locker room.”

Experts note that victims frequently minimize their circumstances, and in Natalie Harp’s case, signs of trafficking can sometimes include a six-figure salary, regular appearances on OAN, and continued employment in a job they actively sought.

On Sunday, Trump advocates took to the airwaves to defend the president.

“It is physically impossible for the President to commit sexual assault,” shouted Stephen Miller on Fox News. “To be in his presence is to understand his glory. That’s consent. Frankly, he should sign an executive order reinstating Prima Nocta.”

Sources said Trump appeared strangely invigorated by the nonexistent scandal, repeatedly asking aides whether reporters were still “talking about the thing with the blonde.”

“He’s an eighty-year-old man,” said one unnamed aide, ”The rumors make him feel like a virile young rapist again.”

Today, Ronan Farrow reportedly left a rough draft of his New Yorker article in Natalie Harp’s mailbox with a note saying all she had to do was fill in the blanks:

“On ______ (date), Donald Trump ______ (verb) my ______ (body part) in the ______ (location).”

“She’ll speak her truth eventually,” Farrow said confidently. “Or she’ll get a cushy time slot on Fox News. Only time will tell.”

At press time, Trump had reportedly begun responding to the allegations of the allegations, posting to X multiple times in one hour, denying impropriety and labeling any claim a “Fake News Witch Hunt.”

Users were quick to pin a community note to each of the president’s posts, linking to the infamous Access Hollywood tape, where he bragged on a hot microphone that fame allowed him to “grab ’em by the pussy.”

While there is currently no allegation that President Trump has handled Natalie Harp by vulva, the White House has yet to confirm or deny that such an assault took place.

The silence is stunning.

There’s an obvious desperate need to know what’s inside mystery meat.

If I’m going to spend my time reading a novel, I’d like to know if a person actually wrote the damn thing. If I’m representing an author, I need confidence that they aren’t a fraud. Teachers need to know that students are doing the work. Platforms like Substack need subscribers to believe that the writers they’re financially supporting are legitimate. It’s the only way Substack can continue functioning as OnlyFans for victims of carpal tunnel syndrome.

Unfortunately, satisfying that need requires something we don’t currently have: A definitive AI detector. Instead, what we got was Dr. Pangram rolling into town with their Patented Cure-All Elixirs and Genuine AI detectors. All they’ve done is make the situation exponentially worse.

Pangram works by training an AI on enormous collections of text labeled “human-written,” “AI-generated,” or “human writing altered by AI.” It learns statistical patterns associated with those categories, then examines new writing and predicts which category, or mixture of categories, it most closely resembles.

And the key word there is predicts.

AI detectors do not detect machine authorship the way a breathalyzer detects alcohol or a Geiger counter detects radiation. Pangram isn’t finding hidden metadata or some forensic trace left behind by ChatGPT or Claude. (Or, at least, not yet. More on that later.) It’s just classifying prose according to patterns it has learned to associate with human and machine writing.

It’s looking at the text and asking which pile it most resembles: Human. AI. Or, “I dunno, maybe both?”

That’s far from definitive proof and about as scientific as phrenology. Hell, just reading this essay and taking an educated guess, you are doing exactly what their slop detector does.

Yet, Pangram wants you to treat their educated guess as if it’s an official certificate of authenticity. I’m honestly surprised they’re not selling physical copies of the results on cardstock with a gold seal.

This wouldn’t be as much of an issue if the society we lived in had any nuance, but AI-detector results are often treated as irrefutable proof. Pangram might be offering us a percentage, but so many of us are operating in a binary. A frowning robot face accompanied by “30% likely AI-written” can very quickly become “30% of this is AI,” which becomes “this author used AI,” which becomes “100% fraud. Fuck that guy.”

And simply looking at how quickly Pangram and AI-authorship scandals are expanding over time is galling:

• March 19: Hachette pulls Shy Girl after Pangram founder Max Spero scanned the novel and reported it as 78% AI-generated.

• May 13: Pangram 3.3 launches.

• May 19: The Jamir Nazir scandal explodes as Pangram reports his award-winning short story The Serpent and the Grove is 100% AI-generated.

• June: Pangram reports its monthly users have increased from roughly 2,700 to 120,000 over the past year.

• July 21: Substack integrates Pangram, putting its AI scanner directly in front of readers.

• July 22: Researchers submit a study analyzing 14,419 self-published books using Pangram. Roughly 37% contain at least some detected AI text.

• July 27: The Atlantic reports on that study, spotlighting the novel Daggermouth, which Pangram classified as roughly 60% AI-generated.

• July 29: Pangram 4 publicly launches alongside a $9 million funding announcement.

• July 29: That very same day, Europa agency cut ties with Jerry Falade, a 20-year-old Nigerian PhD student who wrote Call Me, I’ll Hide the Body, a debut novel so compelling it launched a fourteen-way bidding war between major publishers.

• July 31: Falade’s collapsed $2 million deal becomes major publishing news.

While Jerry Falade’s former agent, Marc Gerald, explicitly says they did not use AI-detection software when concerns arose about Call Me, I’ll Hide the Body, it makes absolutely no sense when you think about it, especially when you take what he told The Guardian.

According to Gerald, an editor had already raised concerns about possible AI use midway through the submission process. Europa considered running the manuscript through a detector but decided against it because Falade was “clear and credible” in his explanation.

And that’s…weirdly trusting for the environment we’re in, but alright.

Then, on the evening of July 27, The Atlantic published what was essentially the most catastrophically relevant Pangram advertisement imaginable: a bestselling BookTok novel had sailed through the publishing industry, landed a seven-figure deal, and was now being publicly accused of being roughly 60% AI-generated because Pangram said so.

The story immediately began circulating through publishing and AI circles. Whether it reached Europa’s office, I have no idea, but if there was ever an article destined for a literary agency’s group chat, this was it. If there’s one thing practically guaranteed to be talked about around the water cooler, it’s gossip about your own industry when it breaks into the national news.

So imagine you’re Marc Gerald on July 28. You’re sitting on a potential two-million-dollar bestseller that an editor warned might contain AI, and the publishing world is suddenly gawking at an Atlantic article where another successful novel is being accused of the same thing. That’s not something you say, “Huh, curious,” to and then move on with your day. Europa had titillated and teased the publishing world until Falade’s manuscript turned into a fourteen-way bidding orgy. The multimillion-dollar deal, Gerald’s reputation, his relationships with every publisher at the table, and the future of his agency were all at stake.

But apparently nobody got curious enough to spend ten seconds uploading the manuscript to Pangram. Europa figuratively said, “Nope. We said we aren’t going to use an AI detector on this mystery meat written by some mystery guy we just met, and by God, we’re sticking to it.”

Then July 29 arrives, the day Marc Gerald sits down with Falade for the meeting that will soon end their relationship. That also happens to be the exact day Pangram released Version 4, which was available to use by at least 8:05 a.m. EDT, judging by Pangram’s Business Wire announcement.

Thankfully, nobody at Europa thought to try the shiny new detector model boasting 99% accuracy on the manuscript before the meeting with Falade, because I know what happened when I rescanned my old writing with Pangram 4. Many of my 100% human-written Onion articles that Pangram 3.3 happily certified as 100% human suddenly came back with enormous portions labeled AI-assisted or AI-generated. Search Engine Journal has reported similarly absurd detector behavior, including AI flags on articles written long before ChatGPT existed. Take a look around Substack, and you’ll see much of the same frustration and dismay.

Just imagine if Marc Gerald had run Call Me, I’ll Hide the Body through that brand-new detector before Falade’s July 29 meeting and received similar results. He might have been absolutely hysterical seeing some horrifying percentage accompanied by Pangram’s little frowny robot. At the very top of his mind would’ve been the knowledge that if anyone else ran Call Me, I’ll Hide the Body through Pangram 4, they would see the same results, including anyone working at those fourteen publishers.

If Marc Gerald had used Pangram and gotten an ugly result, I can imagine him feeling like his career as a literary agent was about to burn to the ground within days. He would’ve gone into that meeting with Jerry Falade and sat down, not with an inspiring new young author, but with the arsonist.

Jerry Falade, meanwhile, might’ve had no idea how bad things looked until he walked into the conference room.

But Marc Gerald did not use Pangram. Because he said he didn’t. The timing of the meeting with Jerry Falade was just… dumb luck?

Having Pangram inside that meeting would’ve completely changed the conversation. It’s no longer about taking Jerry Falade at his word and finding him “clear and credible” in his explanation.

Jerry Falade isn’t being asked, “Did you use AI?”

They’re pointing to specific segments highlighted in red and demanding he “explain why this machine says you used AI.”

Maybe Falade gets nervous. Big meetings like this are never mano a mano. They’re always packed with the mid-level types whose job description amounts to “attending the big meeting for some reason.” They all would’ve been staring at the author with all the intensity of, “So those DMs you sent a 14-year-old are currently trending on Twitter.”

Maybe he answers the same question three slightly different ways because “I don’t know why” isn’t good enough, and Pangram’s results don’t actually tell you why they think AI wrote a segment. They just say it is.

Maybe Gerald hears only the contradictions because he’s staring at a very official-looking report from Pangram “clearly and credibly” calling Falade a liar and knows how dangerous the situation suddenly looks for everyone in that conference room.

But Marc Gerald didn’t run Call Me, I’ll Hide the Body through Pangram, so I guess we’re supposed to assume Jerry Falade sat down and broke under the sheer weight of his shame.

Whatever actually happened in that room, after the meeting that totally had nothing to do with Pangram, “aspects of [Falade’s] story changed,” and Gerald decided he could no longer have “total faith” in him.

Again, the actual details are murky. Falade has retained an attorney and everyone has battened down the hatches in preparation of the inevitable legal shitstorm. My best guess is that while Pangram results might be definitive enough to hold up and ruin a career, they’re definitely not going to hold up in court.

What concerns me about Pangram is that it isn’t an open-source nonprofit operated by volunteers fighting for truth, justice and a saner internet. It’s a multimillion-dollar startup selling a product whose value increases the more paranoid people become about AI. While I have absolutely zero evidence that Pangram is deliberately manufacturing false positives, I also don’t have any evidence that telling paranoid people, “You’re wrong. There’s nothing to worry about. They aren’t out to deceive you,” is a functional business model. The incentive structure is there. They need to give subscribers a reason to stick around.

Hell, just having Pangram’s Chrome extension enabled while visiting Substack is enough to lose all faith in the platform. Of the ten articles in my feed, Pangram flagged seven as AI-generated. Of those seven, four were completely fine reads that sounded like they were written by a human. But even with my awareness of Pangram’s flaws and the unfair bias we have against mystery meat, my interest in spending time on those articles was greatly diminished. It was like watching a magician and knowing how all the tricks were done. I wasn’t amazed. I was just sitting there with my arms crossed, feeling smug.

AI detection also has an ugly history with non-native English writing. Earlier detectors have disproportionately flagged writers whose English is less varied or follows more predictable structures. Whether Pangram 4 reproduces that specific bias to the same degree is a separate question, but the stakes are obvious when writers like Falade are the ones being scrutinized. The last thing we need is a statistical classifier channeling the spirit of Stephen Miller and deciding somebody’s prose isn’t fully human.

I can say with certainty that detectors can have trouble with formulaic writing because I’ve watched it happen to my own work. My Onion-style articles get flagged particularly hard because fake news articles are naturally rigid and formulaic.

After writing this absurdly long essay that I eventually split into two parts, I checked the Pangram V.4 results and realized that much of what it considers “AI-written” is, in fact, “AI-Assisted,” and its marketed ability to detect the difference between the two doesn’t really work.

Generally, I tend to use AI like a journalist uses an in-house fact-checker, proofer, and editor.

Specifically for these essays, I used ChatGPT to fact-check, nitpick, and fix my poor grammar. I also bounced ideas off it, and it complained about my baseless supposition about Marc Gerald in return. I did not ask ChatGPT to rewrite, expand or develop any of the content. Did it try to do that anyway? Yes, of course it did. It also wanted to space the essay into a 40-page poem for some reason. I did not go with the vast majority of those suggestions.

Pangram rated the rough draft as 100% human, but the score fell to 80% on the final draft. After spending 30+ whole-ass hours writing ~5,000 words, I take umbrage at the idea that a machine thinks I didn’t write ~1000 of them, because fuck you, I did. I definitely did.

You can see the Pangram results on the penultimate draft of both essays here. I hate that sharing the results feels like shooting myself in the foot, but I’d rather use them to point something out.

You know all that baseless supposition ChatGPT complained about? It did its damnedest to soften my words, and I admittedly folded and left a lot of it in.

But you see all that red there? That’s the stuff Pangram says is AI, but the vast majority of it is actually my original writing. The unhighlighted “human” portions, you know, the stuff that is making damn sure you don’t think I’m stating a theory as a fact? That was 100% ChatGPT.

A lot of what Pangram scores as AI comes down to using ChatGPT in my workflow. I write the rough draft, refine it with a second draft, then hand it over to ChatGPT. It then smooths down the edges, deletes some filler words, and maybe rearranges a clause or two. It basically acts as a smarter version of Grammarly, saving me from hours of monotonous line-by-line clean-up. Occasionally, it insists I add some clarification, like the lawyer-proofing above, and I leave it in.

The underlying words are still mine. The thought is still mine. By the time it’s done, roughly 95% of the text remains the same.

Pangram V4 marks that as fully AI-generated.

Take this paragraph, for example. Here’s the original version from the rough draft and how Pangram scores it.

So much of this feels like, “No duh” moment when you take a step back and look at how we got here. Silicon Valley gobbled up copyrighted work by the terabyte to train their machines. No one should be surprised that anything those machines touch is now in a murky grey legal void.

And here is what it became after ChatGPT took a pass, then I added my final finishing tweaks:

So much of this feels like a giant “no duh” moment once you step back and look at how we got here. Silicon Valley gobbled up copyrighted work by the terabyte to train these machines. We shouldn’t be particularly surprised that the legal status of whatever the machine churns out ends up in a murky gray swamp.

The first time I noticed this tendency with Pangram V.4, I spent about two hours rewriting one completely human-written section just to get the damn machine to recognize it as 100% human. Eventually, I gave up and had an AI make the section 100% human for me.

Which pretty much entirely defeats the purpose of the AI detector.

If everyone has access to the same generative models, people assume everyone is using them. We start believing everything we see is generated.

If everyone has access to the same AI detector, we’ll just assume everyone is using it to game the results.

Nothing changes.

We’re already getting an entire reactive industry built around this absurdity. AI number one generates the slop. AI number two detects the slop. AI number three “humanizes” the slop of AI number one, defeating AI number two. I tested this myself by having ChatGPT generate an intentionally obnoxious AI paragraph, then ran that paragraph through Undetectable.AI. Pangram subsequently scored the resulting machine-generated rewrite as 100% human.

Congratulations. The psychic chicken picked the wrong cup.

Which brings us to the closest thing we have to an actual solution: Anthropic recently announced that Claude-generated text will include an imperceptible watermark. Unlike Pangram, a genuine text watermark could provide something more concrete than examining prose and asking, “Does this look statistically AI-ish?” For the first time, we may actually have something approaching forensic evidence of AI involvement.

A lot of people are understandably hailing watermarking as a solution. I’m less convinced, mainly because I played video games and grew up with The Pirate Bay.

The history of DRM is basically an endless cycle of companies inventing increasingly sophisticated locks and then the internet shouting, “Oh! Puzzle!” and immediately cracking them open. Hitman 2 shipped with a new version of Denuvo in 2018, and pirates cracked it so quickly that the crack was available before the game was officially released. Make that make sense.

Maybe Anthropic has built something remarkably resilient, but somebody will make removing that watermark their weekend project the second widespread detection tools exist. There’s money to be made from defeating it, so every company currently advertising an AI “humanizer” will eventually start boasting that it can scrub watermarks too.

Even with the EU pushing AI companies toward transparency measures like watermarking, not every model on Earth is going to cooperate. Open-weight and uncensored models will always operate outside compliant commercial systems, and I highly doubt Elon Musk will allow his Anti-Woke Freedom Bot to start narking on itself.

But watermarking still has one enormous benefit. If it works well enough to catch the laziest copy-pasted machine sludge, it may remove enough garbage from consideration to lower the ambient paranoia. A publisher confronted with a suspicious manuscript could at least check whether it contains a known watermark instead of asking Pangram for some literary palm reading.

When I take a step back, though, I have to ask: What the hell are we even doing? Why are we demanding that writing, a medium already seen as archaic by generations growing up with chronic TikTok brainrot, remain some pure, organic artisanal craft? It’s not a competitive sport. We’re just telling a freakin’ story.

Jerry Falade should be able to ask an AI to look up the effects of decomposition and bloating on a corpse without planting the seeds of his downfall. Authors should be able to use AI without treating any contact with it as disqualifying, as long as they’re honest about what it actually contributed. Prohibition never works. It only turns normal people into liars and frauds, which makes the actual liars and frauds feel right at home.

AI use in writing needs to be graded on a spectrum, not a binary. AI disclosure needs to become a surmountable penalty, not an immediate disqualification. Basically, we need to get to a place where AI-assisted work can be judged on its quality, because we’re never going to stop having mystery meat to contend with. That doesn’t mean we can’t still whip out the Grade-F stamp for the fully generated slop.

It just means we have to consider using grades A-D for mystery meat.

About a month ago, I wrote Dead Audience Theory and put forward a somewhat unsettling notion: When we believe we’re surrounded by AI slop, we stop engaging with the new and unfamiliar and start behaving like paranoid misanthropes. Over time, authentic human interaction disappears not because AI has replaced every human, but because we no longer trust that anyone is human in the first place.

Since then, the universe decided to stress-test my thesis with some 100% certified gen-u-wine AI-detecting divining rods, Substack integrated Pangram into its website, and the publishing world started cannibalizing its young.

It’s beginning to feel like we’re in that phase of every zombie apocalypse story where the military starts killing everyone, infected and uninfected alike, in a desperate attempt to stop the spread. That never works out. We’re just going to end up with a handful of survivors navigating a world filled with the undead moaning, “I got you, fam,” and injecting little comments about Gremlins and raccoons.

So I thought it’d be best to write a follow-up.

Originally, this was going to be me pointing at our fraying collective sanity and smugly saying, “I told you so.” Instead, somewhere along the way, I had a nightmare revelation:

We’ve spent years teaching ourselves not to trust anything we can’t prove is human. Now that paranoia has reached publishing’s gatekeepers, trusting that an unknown writer actually wrote the manuscript in front of them could become a multimillion-dollar mistake. Eventually, they may decide the safest solution is to stop opening the gate at all.

Since writing Dead Audience Theory, the publishing industry has provided a few increasingly grim case studies to throw onto the book-burning bonfire, making Jamir Nazir, a marginalized author who won a short-story contest only to get tarred and feathered by Pangram and the internet, look almost quaint.

Hachette pulled Mia Ballard’s Shy Girl after allegations that parts of the novel were AI-generated. Ballard denied using AI to write the book herself, saying any AI-produced material might have come from a freelance editor she hired.

Jerry Falade made waves in the literary world with his debut crime novel, Call Me, I’ll Hide the Body, which prompted a fourteen-way bidding war and reportedly earned him an offer of over $2 million before questions about AI use derailed his career almost overnight.

This second case is especially telling.

Fourteen publishers read a manuscript from a complete unknown and decided they wanted it. FOURTEEN.

Even if Call Me, I’ll Hide the Body had been entirely written by ChatGPT, there’s no coherent way to call the finished product “slop.” Fourteen professional publishing houses independently looked at it and decided there was money sitting on those pages. They were probably fan-casting the inevitable film adaptation in the break room.

We should be looking at Jerry Falade, a 20-year-old Nigerian PhD candidate who until very recently looked like publishing’s next breakout author, and be impressed, if not a little resentful, at his sudden success. Again, fourteen publishers were fighting over him. Meanwhile, I’m still getting rejection emails from a manuscript I submitted over a year ago.

The thing I can’t wrap my head around is how nothing about the story itself changed. The words didn’t suddenly get worse once the accusations of AI surfaced. The characters didn’t become less compelling. The prose didn’t spontaneously sprout six fingers. They were still holding the same manuscript. An anonymous editor who bid on the novel told The Bookseller that they didn’t detect any AI while reading it, “and neither did any of [their] sales, marketing or publicity colleagues who also read alongside [them].”

Yet the mere suggestion that AI might have touched Falade’s book was enough for agents and publishers to go from turning the page and seeing a potential bestseller to finding themselves holding a pipe bomb.

At first, I thought about all this like a reader. The thing about text that may or may not be AI-generated, what I’ve come to think of as “mystery meat,” is that once the AI accusation is out there, the work can no longer be judged by something as quaint as its quality. AI slop can’t be good. It can only be considered trash or fraud and then immediately discarded. Simply reading something that might be AI feels like being duped, and the more you happen to enjoy it, the bigger sucker you are.

There’s actually some research backing this up. In a recent Villanova study, 1,498 people read either human-written or ChatGPT-generated short stories without being told their real origins. On pure quality, the AI stories actually scored higher overall. But both human and AI stories received lower ratings when participants were told ChatGPT wrote them.

In two follow-up experiments involving another 905 people, readers were also found to be as accurate as a coin flip at telling the human stories apart from the AI ones.

An even larger study published this year found essentially the same phenomenon across 27,491 participants: evaluations of creative writing consistently fell when people believed AI had written or even helped write it. The researchers call it an “AI disclosure penalty”

In other words, the words themselves weren’t determining their judgment. Their belief about where the words came from was.

Which brings us right back to Falade. His former agent, who dropped him after questions about AI use arose, told The Bookseller, “The book was stunningly good; everyone fell in love with it.” I can’t help but notice the past tense there.

By Falade’s own account, he used a locally hosted LLM for research purposes but did not use AI to write the novel. Sure, a locally hosted model doesn’t leave much of a paper trail, which understandably raises an eyebrow, but the novel is called Call Me, I’ll Hide the Body. It’s probably safe to assume that asking Claude too many research questions on that particular subject is a great way for a Nigerian immigrant to get a visit from Trump’s FBI.

I’m inclined to believe Falade’s explanation, and I certainly wouldn’t consider that kind of AI use disqualifying. The fact that publishing may not see such distinctions as cleanly is particularly terrifying for me because I’m using ChatGPT as a research assistant to write a novella right now.

AI is an amazing tool for writing research. It isn’t penning the novella for me. It’s doing most of the Googling. The story takes place in 1930s Chicago, and ChatGPT can quickly answer extremely specific historical questions, then provide sources so I can verify them. Better yet, it can read the rough draft with that context in mind and point out things like, “Hey, Chicago has greystones, not brownstones,” or, “That random street you pulled off Google Maps didn’t exist in 1932. Use this one instead.”

Initially, I couldn’t see why that kind of AI use would be such a problem for publishers, and the abruptness of what happened to Falade didn’t sit right with me. Surely one of those fourteen publishers would look at the situation and recognize that they were still holding the same manuscript they had fought over. If anything, you’d expect someone to slap a “damaged goods” sticker on it, lop a couple of zeros off the offer and see if Falade would take the deal.

Except the words weren’t the thing that changed. The perceived provenance of the words did.

According to Deadline, after rescinding its submission, Hodgman Literary sent what amounted to a career-destroying burn notice to international publishers: “[The author] produced an incredible manuscript that dazzled us and the top publishing professionals around the world. Unfortunately, we are no longer able to authenticate how the manuscript fully evolved from origin to completion.”

Read that last sentence again. If you’re a writer and you’re not shivering a little, you should be.

“We are no longer able to authenticate how the manuscript fully evolved from origin to completion.”

Can you prove to me that you didn’t use AI in your writing? Can anyone? Taking you at your word simply isn’t good enough, especially if I’m the publisher. The stakes are too high.

Under current U.S. Copyright Office policy, human-authored expression is copyrightable under current law, while purely AI-generated expression is not. A work that includes some AI material may still receive copyright protection, but the protection only covers the portions created by a human, depending on how much creative control the person who created it had.

That distinction sounds perfectly reasonable, until you’re a publisher staring at a manuscript and you have no idea where one ends and the other begins. Tisha Morris, an entertainment attorney who specializes in publishing law, told The Post, “Publishers need confidence that the author can grant the rights promised in the publishing agreement, that the work is eligible for copyright protection, and that it does not contain unauthorized material generated from third-party sources.

So much of this feels like a giant “no duh” moment once you step back and look at how we got here. Silicon Valley gobbled up copyrighted work by the terabyte to train these machines. We shouldn’t be particularly surprised that the legal status of whatever the machine churns out ends up in a murky gray swamp.

If Falade is telling the truth and only used a local LLM for research, none of this should matter to the copyrightability of his novel. But the publishers weren’t in the room while he wrote it. They don’t actually know him. All they have to go on is the two-million dollars worth of manuscript-shaped mystery meat in front of them. The second a question arose about AI, the publisher wasn’t just buying a novel. They were buying uncertainty. Uncertainty over copyright protection. Uncertainty over whether some third party might bring an infringement claim. Uncertainty over the foreign rights, film rights, audiobook rights and translated editions.

And, oh yeah, there’s also the possibility that the entire literary world finds out the publisher paid millions for AI slop. You can’t forget that.

What’s crazy is that the publishers weren’t even the ones who pulled the plug. Falade’s own agent did. Marc Gerald was sitting on a fourteen-way auction, a reported offer north of two million dollars, and what could have been the kind of deal an agent talks about for the rest of his career. But once he could no longer personally vouch for how that manuscript had been created, the safer professional decision was apparently to set fire to his golden ticket.

And I cannot stress this part enough: no one in this whole debacle has publicly produced definitive proof that Call Me, I’ll Hide the Body contains AI-generated prose.

If anything, the way they’re talking about the whole ordeal sounds a lot like somebody consciously trying not to get sued for defamation after they did a whole lotta defaming. They are “no longer able to authenticate” how it was created and can “no longer substantiate” his assurances.

The point I keep coming back to is that what turns text into mystery meat isn’t simply that AI may have been used somewhere in its creation. It’s that we don’t know how AI was used, if it was used at all, and will probably never know.

Everything we read these days is mystery meat on some level. If we don’t know the author personally and can’t verify the chain of custody, we’re just staring at words on a screen and making assumptions. What’s so off-putting about Hodgman Literary’s line, “We are no longer able to authenticate how the manuscript fully evolved from origin to completion,” is that it can easily be applied to every single manuscript submitted since 2019.

So much human creativity is already suffering because we keep looking at the unknown and assuming it’s probably fraudulent simply because AI existed at the time of its creation. Now it increasingly looks like publishers may have a financial and legal incentive to do the same thing. Mystery meat may soon become impossible to publish.

I don’t know what standard writers are being held to, and I’m not convinced the publishing world knows either. If using any form of AI in your writing is completely disqualifying, then that’s a far bigger problem. How do you disprove a negative like that?

Did I just blacklist my 1930s novella by admitting I used ChatGPT for research? What about my future manuscripts? Between Dead Audience Theory and this essay, I’ve clearly established a disturbing pattern of AI use.

What should concern us is everything we don’t see because it didn’t make the news.

How many book deals have quietly died because somebody got a whiff of AI? What Pangram percentage will kill a novel in the crib? Do publishers understand that the model is fallible?

How deeply has this fear penetrated publishing? Are acquisition editors checking old blog posts and social media accounts when provenance questions arise, and being scared off by the slightest bit of evidence that an author touched ChatGPT?

Will writers be asked to document their process? To what extent? To truly “authenticate how the manuscript fully evolved from origin to completion,” agents and publishers would have to see the author’s unpublished drafts, revision history, hell, even internet history. You’d have to scrutinize the entire writing process like it’s Epstein’s prison cell and demand a complete, unedited video recording of the author typing on their computer. God forbid a minute of footage is missing. That’s just enough time for Jerry Falade to open a browser in incognito mode and ask ChatGPT a question about rigor mortis. Now everyone is questioning the authenticity of the suicide note his main character left behind.

There’s already widespread anxiety among writers that AI may increasingly be used to prune the slush pile. Is Pangram going to be yet another filter a manuscript has to get past before human eyes spend five minutes scanning your work? Are agents going to quietly reject anything that trips a detector rather than risk becoming the next person quoted in an embarrassing AI scandal? Faced with hundreds or thousands of submissions, why spend hours investigating whether a 13% AI score on Pangram is a false positive when you can simply move on to the next manuscript?

To be clear, I don’t doubt that most of what gets rejected will be garbage. An impressive amount of it will even be legitimate AI slop.

But the next Fight Club might be sitting in there too.

The rules around copyrightability and AI-generated material also desperately need more clarity, not because machine slop deserves some sacred legal protection, but because genuine human work is increasingly getting caught in the ambiguity. The second Random House thinks it may have to go through a novel with a fine-toothed comb to figure out which sentences are protected, which aren’t, and whether some copyright troll could plausibly raise a stink, is the second they get the ick and don’t publish that novel.

They simply can’t pass on every unknown author peddling mystery meat, because that will just end with them never publishing any new authors—

—Actually, I take that back. They can do just that.

They basically already are.

For every Jerry Falade, a hundred authors are wondering how the hell he even got Marc Gerald to read page one. I’ve submitted two manuscripts now to countless agents and only ever gotten one email that wasn’t a form letter. Even that one was just two blunt sentences someone had bothered to type themselves. It basically boiled down to, “This is sci-fi and too long. Publishers won’t touch it, so agents aren’t going to look at it. Sorry.”

I stopped wasting my time after that.

Sigh. And that’s what self-publishing is for.

Hopefully Falade will publish the book himself and make everybody look stupid. That doesn’t solve the problem. It just means the gate stayed closed and he had to go around it. In that regard, I wish Falade the very best.

I know I, for one, am excited to read Call Me, I’ll Hide the Body when it comes out.

However it ends up on my Kindle.

Thanks for reading. Keep an eye out for the next chapter in this whole mess: Total Pangramonium, releasing later this week.

TO: All Deep Estate Personnel
FROM: Office of Administrative Services

It has come to the Director’s attention that a Ken Harry has escaped from Research and is currently somewhere within the Deep Estate.

As always, it is critical to keep in mind that Ken Harrys are non-violent and your safety is not at risk. However, despite their appearance, Ken Harrys are NOT human.

All Ken Harrys resemble the same 35-year-old Caucasian male with naturally blond hair and blue eyes. They are 5’11”, weigh 182 pounds, and naturally present wearing a white button-up shirt and brown slacks.

When confronted, a Ken Harry will attempt to initiate small talk. It typically presents with an upbeat attitude and prefers office aphorisms such as “Let’s touch base” or “Teamwork makes the dream work.”

Since today is Monday, a Ken Harry is extremely likely to complain that it is Monday and ask you about your weekend.

THE INCIDENT: At approximately 8:10 a.m., Ken Harry #4631 became aware that the date was August 10th and entered an agitated state, repeatedly expressing concern that he had forgotten to buy a birthday gift for his son, Timmy.

Again, Ken Harrys are not human. Timmy is not real, despite their ability to talk at length about their children and their tendency to produce a wallet containing a family photo.

Ken Harry #4631 escaped the laboratory to search for this gift. It is likely to still have IV and catheter lines attached, a shaved head, and surgical markings along the forehead and temple in preparation for its interrupted craniotomy.

IMPORTANT: Ken Harrys have a natural lifespan of approximately one 40-hour workweek. This particular Ken Harry has exceeded that limit and is now considered unstable.

If a Ken Harry appears pale, distressed, disoriented, or begins repeating office phrases with unusual urgency, the entity is highly likely to rupture. Employees must maintain a safe distance of at least 15 feet to avoid unnecessary staining of clothing.

If Ken Harry #4631 is spotted:

• DO NOT remind Ken Harry that it is not human.

• DO NOT say its trigger phrase: “You may clock out now, Ken.”

• DO NOT ask Ken Harry when it last saw its family.

• DO NOT inquire about its personal opinion regarding its pending craniotomy or live vivisection.

• DO NOT suggest gift ideas for its nonexistent son.

• DO attempt to reassure Ken Harry that stores are still open.

• DO suggest busywork to keep it occupied, then notify Security of its location.

If possible, maintain visual contact from a safe distance until Security arrives.

We are aware that some employees have ethical and moral concerns regarding the use of Ken Harrys as live test subjects, unpaid temporary workers, and occasional manual labor.

Employees are welcome to submit all comments and complaints to the HR suggestion box.

Under no circumstances should employees attempt to hide Ken Harry #4631 or assist it in escaping the Deep Estate.

Thank you for your cooperation.

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐟𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐨𝐰𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐢𝐧𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐢𝐬 𝐜𝐥𝐚𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐞𝐝 𝐚𝐬 𝐈𝐍𝐓𝐄𝐑𝐍𝐀𝐋 𝐔𝐒𝐄 𝐎𝐍𝐋𝐘. 𝐃𝐮𝐩𝐥𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧, 𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐬𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧, 𝐨𝐫 𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐛𝐮𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐨𝐮𝐭𝐬𝐢𝐝𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐃𝐞𝐞𝐩 𝐄𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐢𝐬 𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐥𝐲 𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐛𝐢𝐝𝐝𝐞𝐧. 𝐄𝐦𝐩𝐥𝐨𝐲𝐞𝐞𝐬 𝐟𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐝 𝐢𝐧 𝐯𝐢𝐨𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐁.𝐎.𝐁. 𝐬𝐞𝐜𝐫𝐞𝐜𝐲 𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐚𝐭𝐞, 𝐚𝐥𝐨𝐧𝐠 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐚𝐧𝐲 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐮𝐧𝐚𝐮𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐳𝐞𝐝 𝐫𝐞𝐜𝐢𝐩𝐢𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬, 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐬𝐮𝐛𝐣𝐞𝐜𝐭 𝐭𝐨 𝐞𝐱𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐦𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐨 𝐚𝐧 𝐇𝐑 𝐛𝐥𝐚𝐜𝐤𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐞.

TO: All Deep Estate Personnel
FROM: Office of Administrative Services

It has come to the Director’s attention that multiple employees have been submitting an “Official Hot Dog Requisition Form” (K-17HZ9) through the pneumatic tube network and receiving a hot dog approximately 5–10 minutes later.

Please note:

• K-17HZ9 is not a recognized or authorized K-form configuration.

• The Deep Estate DOES NOT contain a Hot Dog Department. All correspondence addressed to the Hot Dog Department is marked “undeliverable.” It remains in the mail room for 30 days before being incinerated.

• Neither Food Services nor any other department has been authorized to manufacture, procure, or distribute hot dogs outside of the cafeterias.

• The origin of these hot dogs remains unknown.

Testing by the Research Division has confirmed that the hot dogs are safe to eat. However, doing so is ill-advised.

Due to the hot dog’s unique properties, its internal temperature remains exactly 120°F at all times. This includes experiments in which the hot dog was submerged in liquid nitrogen or molten iron.

While the hot dog itself appears incapable of spoilage, do not store the remains of a hot dog in a refrigerator or freezer. The residual heat will increase the temperature inside the appliance, likely spoiling the food around it.

Additionally, Section 1-2 of the Hot Dog Requisition Form, which allows employees to select a beef, pork, or turkey hot dog, is also verifiably misleading. Regardless of the option selected, the same hot dog is received. While it is composed primarily of a processed substance resembling meat, DNA sequencing has failed to match the material to any known species.

It is unlikely that these hot dogs are Kosher or Halal.

The vegetarian option simply sends a bun without the hot dog.

Attempts have been made to stop distribution. Engineering traced the hot dogs to a point where the pneumatic tube emerged directly from a cement wall with no visible connecting pipe. The opening was capped and sealed with epoxy, and approximately one mile of tubing was subsequently removed.

Despite this, hot dogs continue to arrive through the pneumatic tube system several times each day.

The Bureau is aware that this memo will likely have little measurable effect on the growing popularity of Pneumatic Tube Hot Dogs. Continued consumption is not expressly forbidden. However, henceforth, any consumption will be undertaken at the employee’s own risk.

Thank you.

The following information is classified as INTERNAL USE ONLY. Duplication, transmission, or distribution outside the Deep Estate is strictly forbidden. Employees found in violation of the B.O.B. secrecy mandate, along with any and all unauthorized recipients, are subject to extreme rendition to an HR blacksite.

IRVINE, CA— In response to the ongoing Cyclospora outbreak linked to contaminated lettuce, Taco Bell announced Monday that every drive-thru lane nationwide will now connect customers directly to the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline.

“We just want to make sure you’re okay,” explained Taco Bell spokesperson Ashley Goldenblatt. “A Crunchwrap Supreme is a long-term solution to a short-term problem.”

The policy follows mounting concern among mental health professionals and Taco Bell employees that those using the drive-thru are exhibiting severe suicidal ideation.

“This guy wanted to know if the tacos came with lettuce, and when I said yes, he ordered twelve,” said Taco Bell employee Ana Torres. “I asked if he was okay, and he broke down. His wife and kids had just left him, and I didn’t know what to say. I’m not trained to handle these kinds of orders.”

“If you voluntarily order a Crispy Chicken Chipotle Bacon Melt Burrito after watching weeks of news coverage about explosive diarrhea, something isn’t right,” explained psychiatrist Dr. Edward Kim. “This is Taco Bell, after all. Even before the Cyclospora outbreak, anyone going through that drive-thru clearly no longer valued their life.”

Researchers say they first noticed the phenomenon years earlier among Arby’s customers.

“It’s long been established that choosing Arby’s over every other available option is less a food preference and more a cry for help,” Kim admitted. “One in three gunshot su*cides occurs in an Arby’s parking lot. They even say Kurt Cobain had an Arby’s receipt in his pocket the day he died.”

Attempting to calm public fears, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. made a televised visit to a Taco Bell Monday afternoon, insisting he would personally eat a Crunchwrap Supreme to demonstrate the restaurant’s safety.

Employees repeatedly refused to serve him.

“We spent fifteen minutes trying to talk him down,” said shift manager Carlos Mendez. “The poor guy walked in looking like that, sounding like that. We knew he was terminal. And the way he was smiling, it was clear he had already made peace with his family.”

Cashiers reportedly assured Kennedy that there were far gentler forms of euthanasia. One employee went so far as to offer directions to a nearby bridge.

“It has a wonderful view,” the employee said. “Why don’t you experience that instead of shitting yourself to death?”

In the end, RFK still chose to eat the Taco Bell.

The White House later reaffirmed that Kennedy had been attempting to reassure the public and had not, in fact, become actively su*cidal.

Officials then clarified that RFK was now, however, on suicide watch after being admitted to Walter Reed National Military Medical Center.

“After experiencing three continuous days of his anus turning into a blood-tinged shit geyser, anyone would opt to take the easy way out.”

READ PART ONE HERE

War was on the horizon for Little Tel Aviv and the quaint Arizona pseudo-nation-state of New Israel. It began, as modern wars often do, with an email.

“Years ago, I gave twenty bucks to some Jewish political group asking for donations,” said Naomi Yazzie-Goldstein, Rabbi Yaz’s wife. “It was for a congressional candidate who wanted to legalize medical marijuana. I was in the middle of chemo at the time, so I said sure.”

“I also gave them my email and number.” Naomi grimaced. “It was the worst mistake of my life.”

Naomi was stunned when she first read the subject line, written in all caps: !!!URGENT!!! NEW ISRAEL IS A CRITICAL THREAT TO JEWISH SELF-DETERMINATION

The email came from AIPAC, the influential pro-Israel lobbying organization, and included a twelve-page briefing, also titled in all caps: NEW ISRAEL IS JUST OLD BLOOD LIBEL

Three of those twelve pages specifically targeted Rabbi Yazzie-Goldstein as the ideological head of a supposed New Israel hate group.

The message was distributed to countless congressional offices, cable-news producers, university trustees, and celebrities with unusually forceful opinions on where Americans should buy their hummus. Public figures who failed to open it received polite follow-up calls from advocates offering gentle reminders.

Members of Congress received Senator John Fetterman.

“No, I mean he literally kicked down my door,” claimed Senator Cory Booker. “Ripped it straight off the hinges and started screaming that Israel was under attack. I thought Iran had launched another missile strike.”

The PDF functioned as both a talking-points memo and an informal marching order for pro-Israel politicians and commentators. It accused New Israel of practicing “an insidious new form of hatred in which New Israeli Jews launder violent antisemitism through their Jewish identities, peaceful conduct, and ordinary participation in Jewish life.”

“Simply by existing as a Jew, I am spreading hatred,” Yazzie-Goldstein said, shaking his head. “Intersectionality, I understand. White fragility? I read the book. Internalized racism and misogyny? Those are things. But this?”

He smacked the printed briefing against his palm. “This is meshugganah on an epistemological level. ‘I think, therefore I am antisemitic.’”

He took a long, frustrated breath. “And people bought it.”

Within days, New Israel became a fixture of cable news. Democratic Representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz, a recipient of more than $1.5 million in AIPAC-affiliated campaign contributions, called it “an antisemitic Jewish enclave.” A former Clinton adviser described Rabbi Yaz’s synagogue as “a cult preaching radical Judaism, which is essentially radical Islam on bath salts.”

Fox News reduced the controversy to a chyron: WOKE DESERT JEWS BETRAY GOOD DESERT JEWS

Genuine American Voices, an Israeli-owned social-media consulting firm, quietly began offering influencers such as Tim Pool and Laura Loomer five thousand dollars for each anti-New Israel post. Although the influencers denied receiving payments, much of their content appeared to have been copied directly from the AIPAC briefing. More than a few seemed to have walked away with the wrong message.

“The new antisemite celebrates Passover, y’all,” warned one former Fox News blonde turned trad-wife influencer. “They use kosher salt. Really, we need to start keeping an eye on all the Jews, okay? You never know which one might secretly be an antisemite.”

Ben Shapiro grew so worked up predicting that New Israel would lead to “an AOC-DNC-DEI Kristallnacht” that he had to pause his livestream and check his blood pressure.

Rabbi Yazzie-Goldstein took to the airwaves to defend his town, but he proved ill-equipped to navigate the rhetorical minefield now surrounding him.

When accused of antisemitism, he stubbornly replied, “No, I’m Jewish,” or, “You do know I’m a rabbi, right? Can somebody make sure the thing at the bottom of the screen says I’m a rabbi?” He then appeared genuinely bewildered when none of those statements proved satisfactory.

His comment, “I wouldn’t even joke that I’m a self-hating Jew,” was immediately seized upon by AIPAC chief executive Elliot Brandt on CNN.

“Why wouldn’t you joke about it?” Brandt demanded during a split-screen interview. “Because you believe Jews should hate themselves for supporting Israel, right? Because you hate Israel. You’re a Jew-hating Jew Jew from a Jew-hating Jewish town!”

Yazzie-Goldstein looked off-camera toward a producer. “Did he just call me a ‘Jew-hating Jew Jew’?”

He fared no better when asked about his broader politics, failing to understand that every offhand remark would be converted into an official mission statement for the entire community. An MSNBC clip in which he casually said, “New Israel was proudly built on socialist ideals,” fueled a week of right-wing coverage connecting the supposedly antisemitic rabbi to the network’s usual catalog of socialist terrors.

His worst appearance came during an interview with Wolf Blitzer.

“Do you believe Israel has a right to exist?” Blitzer asked.

“I believe New Israel has a right to exist and, more importantly, that we have the right to be left alone,” Yazzie-Goldstein replied, playing for a laugh he did not receive.

Blitzer remained stony-faced. “So you don’t believe Israel has a right to exist.”

“What? No,” Yazzie-Goldstein blustered. “I never said that.”

“Then answer the question. Do you believe Israel has a right to exist?”

What followed was four painful seconds of silence as Yazzie-Goldstein went perfectly still. He blinked three times, then said with sudden conviction, “I believe Patrick Mahomes may have lost a step after that knee surgery. Let’s talk about that.”

Sociologist and media critic Paul Danno, no relation, argued that the attack on New Israel had less to do with politics than wounded national mythology.

“Israel’s perceived value comes from being singular,” Danno explained. “In its own creation myth, it is the Jewish state, built by the chosen people in their chosen land. You cannot simply have some of the chosen people choose some other land over there. Cognitively, the whole structure begins to collapse.”

Danno described the resulting panic as a kind of national ego death.

“You cannot build a national identity around being a miracle, then casually downgrade yourself to merely another state. If Israel is merely another state, it can be judged, discredited, abandoned, or replaced. And within the Zionist imagination, if Israel is abandoned, nobody will be left to protect the Jews.”

Danno sighed. “So when hardcore Zionists look at New Israel, they do not see a small Jewish community celebrating Pride Month. They see the opening scene of the next Holocaust.”

He bobbed his head and admitted, “I know that makes no rational sense. But if you’re thinking rationally, you’re not thinking like a hardcore Zionist.”

Two weeks after the New Israel talking points circulated, President Trump joined the controversy and appeared to reveal the private reasoning behind them.

“Bibi is very concerned,” Trump said. “Very concerned. He tells me, ‘Mr. Trump, Old Israel has Palestinians, New Israel has Indians, basically the same situation.’ But the hippies are getting along. They’ve shot nobody. Zero bombs. Not one. They’re just singing ‘Kumbaya, My Lord,’ and Bibi says it makes them look very bad.”

Netanyahu later clarified that he had merely warned of “a dangerous precedent in which Jews appear capable of living securely alongside another displaced population without reducing them to a permanent security problem.”

“Israel has a right to exist,” Netanyahu added, “regardless of how many people must cease existing to preserve that right.”

In a meager attempt to put out the fire, the town council issued a statement explaining that New Israel was not a foreign nation or political movement. It had no radical ideology or competing theological claim on the Holy Land. The town was simply a municipality in Arizona with award-winning heirloom tomatoes and a semi-regular arts-and-crafts fair.

This only deepened suspicion.

“Why are they so defensive?” asked Hakeem Jeffries, Minority Leader of the U.S. House of Representatives, and recipient of $1,495,709 AIPAC dollars, on the floor of Congress. “If New Israel has nothing to hide, why does it keep insisting it’s just a town? I move that a special committee be formed to uncover the truth.”

The proposal was seconded and passed within the week.

AIPAC-backed politicians began issuing subpoenas and launching investigations into New Israel’s finances, school curriculum, land agreement, agricultural permits, water usage, and suspicious importation of frozen shellfish.

“I said we were a majority-Jewish town. I never said we were all good Jews,” Rabbi Yaz joked during a televised congressional committee hearing. “Even I get a little tempted looking at a shrimp cocktail.”

“Is it true you operate a camp for Jewish children?” Senator Slotkin asked during her allotted five minutes.

The rabbi nodded. “Yes. Our youth summer camp.”

Slotkin leaned into her microphone. “Let the record show that Mr. Yazzie-Goldstein has confirmed they are taking children away from their parents and concentrating them inside a camp.”

The rabbi wagged his finger. “No, no, no, no. I see what you did there. It’s a very nice camp. It has excellent Yelp reviews.”

Slotkin continued. “The Anti-Defamation League has identified New Israel as one of the fastest-growing centers of antisemitic activity in the United States. Do you deny that?”

“Yes,” Yazzie-Goldstein replied.

Slotkin then bent down and retrieved what was intended to be her coup de grâce.

“That’s interesting, because my aides recently visited your town and found several gift shops brazenly selling Nazi paraphernalia.”

A murmur passed through the hearing room as the senator dramatically unfurled a traditional Navajo blanket.

“I count no fewer than thirty-two swastikas on this blanket alone. How do you explain that?”

Yazzie-Goldstein stared at her. “Do you people ever Google anything? No, really. Can somebody use the Google?”

When they refused to “use the Google,” he stubbornly explained that the sacred whirling-log symbol had been part of Navajo culture for thousands of years before the rise of Nazi Germany.

“It’s a Navajo symbol. It has been used by cultures all over the world since practically forever. Frankly, if we’re banning symbols because people put them on their flags and did something monstrous, I’d be more worried about the Star of David.”

A murmur rose from the gallery. Rabbi Yaz’s attorney nudged him sharply.

“That is not a suggestion,” Yazzie-Goldstein added. “Please, God, don’t make this a thing.”

Fox News made it a thing for the next two weeks, repeating the allegation until much of its audience believed the Star of David had been banned inside Little Tel Aviv and every wall in town was covered in swastikas.

Trump inevitably dubbed the community “Nazi Israel” in a long, freewheeling Truth Social post. He also claimed New Israel was where “Nasty” Pelosi and Adam “Shifty” Schiff had buried “probably millions and millions” of Arizona ballots during the 2020 election, a state Trump lost by just under eleven thousand votes.

The chaotic days that followed saw every imaginable species of political lunatic descend upon the town.

“We had guys in red MAGA hats digging holes with tractors, breaking water mains and fiber-optic lines, looking for missing ballots,” said Sheriff Pam ‘with the Bum Knee’ Andrews-Edelstein. “They were bad, but the Bible-thumpers were worse because they brought the cows.”

The first convoy of evangelical Christians pulled into Little Tel Aviv on a Thursday afternoon with a livestock trailer containing two large orange cows. They had driven from Texas after learning that New Israel’s Torah-themed miniature-golf course offered a replica Mount Sinai, a miniature Temple of Jerusalem, and a Holiday Inn Express within walking distance.

“For years, Christians have had to fly halfway around the world to fulfill the prophecy foretold in Revelation,” explained Pastor Dwayne Mercer of the Holy Fire of Danger Christ Church in Lubbock. “Now we can kick off the Rapture and be home by Monday.”

Ari Yazzie-Goldstein, the rabbi’s eldest son and partial owner of Tiny Holy Land, said he found the group attempting to construct a sacrificial altar beside the miniature Temple.

“I told them, ‘Stop or I’m calling the cops,’ and I guess they heard, ‘Start the apocalypse before he calls the cops.’ They opened the back of the trailer, and, well…”

Ari shuddered. “That’s when I discovered they had brought two fully grown bulls because nobody in the church knew what a heifer was.”

Five church members were hospitalized with broken bones and internal injuries.

“I guess that was God’s way of saying you can’t half-ass the apocalypse,” Pastor Mercer later explained.

Then came the Israeli activists.

Rabbi Yaz gestured towards the makeshift barricade on the hill, surrounding the yurt lodgings. For the past day and a half, the protest group had taken to blasting Chumbawamba on repeat in an act of psychological warfare.

“Those kids… Those… fakakta…” The rabbi struggled to find the words.

“Goddamn shithead kids,” Sheriff Pam supplied.

“I still can’t believe my eyes!” Rabbi Yazzie shouted. “That’s a settlement! They built an illegal Israeli settlement right in the middle of town!”

TO BE CONTINUED.

On the morning of the Israeli invasion, Rabbi Yazzie-Goldstein was standing at a makeshift checkpoint, arguing with a border agent over whether a shipment of lemon trees constituted agricultural contraband.

The trees had been ordered for Sukkot and had come from a nursery less than three hundred miles away. They were presently wilting in the back of a pickup truck stuck in a long line of idling vehicles waiting to cross.

Each car had to be thoroughly inspected from top to bottom, passed over by bomb-sniffing dogs, and swabbed for chemical residue. Every bag and container was unpacked and rifled through, then left on the ground for civilians to repack. One Border Patrol agent tossed a jar of baby formula into a dumpster, then consulted his supervisor about a baby bottle full of prepared formula.

Every civilian’s ID had to be checked. Phones were unlocked and scanned. Facial-recognition software and Palantir background searches combed through social media for any hint of extremist leanings. If something didn’t check out, no matter how slight, the traveler was turned away.

“We’re in Arizona,” Rabbi Yazzie-Goldstein pointed out.

The agent consulted a clipboard. “No, you are on the border of a U.S.-sanctioned terror state.”

“Inside Arizona, a U.S. state!” the rabbi shouted. He took a breath and tried to reason with the man. “They’re just lemon trees. What’s so bad about lemons?”

“You know how they say, ‘When life gives you lemons, make lemonade’? Well, lemonade concentrate mixed with gasoline can also make napalm.”

Yazzie-Goldstein stared dumbfounded at the agent.

Later, he would look up the claim that lemons could be weaponized. The closest thing he could find was a fictitious napalm recipe recited by Tyler Durden in Fight Club, and that involved concentrated orange juice.

“This has to be against the Constitution,” Yazzie-Goldstein pressed. “You know, the whole thing about interstate commerce.”

The agent wasn’t listening. Orders were being squawked into his earpiece. He looked past the rabbi toward the low adobe buildings of Little Tel Aviv and the ochre hills beyond, then sighed.

“Sir, I would say take it up with the Supreme Court, but you’re President Netanyahu’s problem now.”

The rabbi sputtered. “President who? What?!”

A rumble came from down the road, the shimmering Arizona heat rising from the asphalt, masking something massive coming their way.

The agents sprang into action, hastily directing as many civilian cars as possible away from the checkpoint, then forcibly pulling drivers from vehicles that had become boxed in.

All Yazzie-Goldstein could do was watch as the head of the IDF convoy, an armored Caterpillar D9 bulldozer, smashed into the pickup truck containing his ceremonial lemon trees, reducing it to twisted steel and pulp.

A hundred APCs and support vehicles followed. Within an hour, an armored vehicle was parked beside the organic grocery co-op, and two soldiers were unrolling concertina wire across the entrance to the weekly farmers’ market.

Israel’s invasion of New Israel had begun.

Rabbi Barry Yazzie-Goldstein, locally known as “Rabbi Yaz,” is a lean, tan man with a long beard and even longer braided hair. He is, in his own words, a “sun-dried hippie.”

Barry was born in 1961 at St. Joseph’s Hospital in Phoenix to Miriam Goldstein, a Jewish social worker from Queens who fell in love with the state of Arizona, and Thomas Yazzie, a local member of the Navajo Nation. Thomas was a simple man who repaired air conditioners and generally distrusted almost every organized religion.

“Except the Jews,” Rabbi Yaz explained. “The Navajo never had to worry about a Jewish missionary. In fact, my father deeply appreciated how aggressively okay they were with him not converting.”

Rabbi Yaz has always taken pride in belonging to two tribes. He grew up celebrating Passover in the spring and attending tribal gatherings in the summer. Wherever he went, he was surrounded by relatives who disagreed about nearly everything except the importance of feeding him.

“Put the two together and you get brisket Navajo tacos. You can’t go wrong there,” the rabbi said, motioning toward a popular local food truck run by his youngest son.

At twenty-three, after studying comparative religion at Berkeley, he entered rabbinical school. He emerged with a beard, a wife named Naomi, and an enduring suspicion of anyone who described history as destiny.

“I’m not anti-Zionist,” Yazzie-Goldstein quickly pointed out. “I protested South African apartheid in the eighties, sure. And, yeah, maybe there are some parallels, but—”

The rabbi stopped walking and shook his head. “Did you see the Knicks last night? Let’s talk about that.”

When Thomas Yazzie died in 1992, Rabbi Yaz inherited stewardship rights over a vast and largely undeveloped tract of tribal land in the Sonoran Desert. The property consisted of several thousand acres of rock, scrub, and abandoned cattle fencing. Its most valuable asset was a decaying roadside attraction called Tiny Holy Land, a Bible-themed miniature-golf course with a fiberglass Mount Sinai, a miniature Temple of Jerusalem, and a ten-foot-tall Tower of Babylon. The land had little commercial value. It was far from the interstate, even farther from reliable water. One appraiser described it as “a beautiful place to die from sun exposure and dehydration.”

Rabbi Yaz regarded this as a challenge.

The commune began in the spring of 1994 with twelve adults, three vans, and one portable generator. After an evening involving several bottles of Manischewitz, marijuana, and mushrooms, Rabbi Yaz penned a document called “The Covenant of the Thirteenth Tribe of Aquarius” and christened the land New Israel.

The name was deliberately grandiose. Yazzie-Goldstein intended it to represent the construction of a civilization in the desert.

“But we weren’t founding a second Jewish state with our little settlement,” he later joked. “We were founding, eh... maybe Palm Springs? Let’s go with that. We were founding an even Jewier Palm Springs.”

Its first residents were all friends of Yazzie, and in his own words, “some variety of dirty hippie.” They lived in yurts and converted school buses while building adobe houses by hand. Electricity was intermittent. Water arrived by truck twice a week.

As New Israel gained popularity, the modest commune grew into the quaint, unincorporated town of Little Tel Aviv. Its politics were aggressively progressive even by the standards of the nineteen-nineties. Queer couples were welcomed, and Rabbi Yaz performed their weddings years before most states were willing to acknowledge that anything legally significant had occurred.

Those marriages exposed an old cartographic problem that would come to define New Israel. While trying to secure spousal health coverage for gay couples, the commune’s resident attorney discovered that New Israel did not technically sit within the Navajo reservation at all. An eighteenth-century survey error, two contradictory federal maps, and a treaty boundary defined by a nonexistent creek had left the property in a jurisdictional blind spot. It was either Arizona or Navajo land, depending on who was asked, with each side assuming it was governed by the other and neither particularly confident it had been legally incorporated at all.

Rabbi Yaz had little interest in the discovery. From the beginning, he insisted that New Israel could exist only with the active participation of the Navajo Nation. It would be nice if insurance companies also took care of “Pam and Nancy with her bum knee.” Rather than fight the Navajo Nation in court, he pushed for formal integration and mutual recognition, effectively making New Israel a tiny Vatican city nested within the Nation, except with yurts and considerably better attitudes toward lesbians.

Or, in his own words, “Self-determination, but let’s not be assholes about it.”

In 1999, the Tribal Council approved a ninety-nine-year cooperative land agreement with New Israel, dubbed “The One State Solution.” What he did not fully understand at the time was how much authority the commune’s attorney had quietly preserved. The resulting agreement gave New Israel control over residency, local courts, policing, zoning, marriage recognition, utilities, and internal governance. Yaz had effectively gone looking for health insurance and accidentally secured the legal framework for a small country.

New Israel’s tax revenue would be shared. Navajo citizens could live, work, and operate businesses in the community without any additional legal hurdles, and the population quickly swelled to resemble everything Yazzie-Goldstein embodied: both Jewish and Indigenous, and entirely, frustratingly liberal. New Israel’s schools taught both Hebrew and the Navajo language. Its governing council reserved seats for tribal representatives, even when they chose not to use them. Some tribal representatives remained suspicious. Others found Goldstein amusing.

“He came in talking about two displaced peoples building something together,” recalled Lena Benally, who served as the community’s planning director. “It took me fifteen minutes to realize he was talking about constructing a place to get a good bagel and schmear.”

The rapid growth of New Israel was nothing short of a miracle. A hydrogeologist living at the commune identified a deep aquifer beneath the property. Solar arrays replaced the portable generators. A grant from the Navajo Nation funded a wastewater-recycling system. The community began producing dates and citrus, along with groves of olive trees, with Rabbi Yaz insisting, “We’re gonna be here a while.”

By 2003, Little Tel Aviv had paved roads, a health clinic, a synagogue, and a quaint main street. By 2014, that main street had evolved into a central pedestrian boulevard lined with palo verde trees. As the residential population ballooned to more than five thousand and tens of thousands of tourists began visiting each year, the old yurts that remained on the hill above town were converted into vacation rentals, and a BuzzFeed listicle named it number three on its list of “America’s Best Liberal Havens Inside a Conservative Nightmare Hellscape.” A major investment in fiber-optic infrastructure proved to be a godsend during the COVID pandemic, as remote workers flocked to the small town and bolstered its middle class. By 2024, Little Tel Aviv was a small city with several developing neighborhoods, a municipal water park, and a revitalized Torah-themed miniature-golf course.

The expansion was not without friction between New Israel and neighboring Navajo communities.

“New Israel has always kind of done whatever it wants, and the Tribal Council doesn’t stop them,” complained Melissa Begay, a resident of the Navajo Nation. “And I know they’re giving a large chunk of their tax revenue to the Nation, but it’s not like I’ve seen any of it.”

“They stopped a casino from opening right on their border,” claimed Nester Chee, another Navajo resident. “They said it didn’t support their town’s values, but I’m pretty sure they did some meddling and pulled some strings. They didn’t like not getting a cut because… you know…”

When we reluctantly asked him to clarify, expecting the worst, Nester replied, “They’re a disproportionately wealthy, semi-autonomous enclave with significant influence over the Tribal Council.”

He frowned. “What? Why do you look so relieved? What did you think I was going to say?”

“It’s a blessing that my boy gets to go to their charter school,” said Ellie Bitsilly, a local waitress and single mother. Her son attends Red Mesa Community Middle School, which strives to fill its classrooms with equal numbers of Jewish and Navajo students.

“But I swear, I’m taking him to some bar or bat mitzvah every weekend nowadays. He’s got a whole collection of monogrammed yarmulkes. The other day, I caught him singing, ‘Die, die, emu. Die, die, emu.’ I thought it was some silly Fortnite song, but he told me it was something for Passover, and I dunno…”

She shrugged and blew air through her lips. “For a Navajo school, it doesn’t seem very Navajo to me.”

Visitors often compared New Israel to Israel itself, but Rabbi Yazzie-Goldstein grew to dislike the comparison.

“Yeah, but Israel has the whole thing with Gaza and the West Bank. It’s—” Yazzie-Goldstein sighed. “Did you see the Diamondbacks last night? I’m starting to think this season might not be total shit.”

The comparison persisted. Then, in the wake of the war in Gaza, it became politicized.

“At first, we were getting tourists coming in to pick a fight with New Israel,” explained Edith Nez, a seventy-year-old member of the Navajo Nation and owner of a vegan ice-cream parlor. “They’d come in and shout, ‘End the genocide!’ and we’d shout back, ‘Yeah, no shit!’ Then they’d sit down, and we’d hand them some free sherbet and try to make them feel heard. Really, that’s all they wanted.”

Yazzie-Goldstein began to worry when he noticed tourists walking around in T-shirts that read “WELCOME TO NEW ISRAEL” on the front and “THE ‘GOOD’ ISRAEL” on the back.

He realized something had changed when tourists began lining up around the block for his son’s food truck.

“I’d never seen so many visitors in a single day,” he recalled.

The rabbi seldom used social media and was shocked when his grandchildren showed him the exponentially growing online conversation surrounding the town. TikTok and Twitter users were comparing New Israel’s decades of peaceful integration with the Navajo people to Israel’s displacement and oppression of Palestinians.

A candid photograph of Jewish teenagers in yarmulkes eating falafel with their Navajo friends became the platform’s top post for the week. Two posts below it was the popular Zoolander meme with the caption, “NEW ISRAEL IS SO HOT RIGHT NOW.”

It seemed New Israel was gaining worldwide recognition for all the reasons it was not Old Israel, and much of the virality stemmed from relabeling Israel proper as “Old Israel.”

“It’s petty, and I kind of love it,” said one visiting UCLA student who asked not to be named. “You spend all that time arguing why what’s happening is wrong on ethical and moral grounds and get nowhere. It just feels good to devastate them with something like, ‘Oh, honey, those bangs aren’t working.’”

“I knew it was a real problem,” Yazzie-Goldstein said. “This is a town where people live, not a political statement about some fakakta ethnostate—”

The rabbi stopped himself. “Have you seen Caitlin Clark? Now that girl has some drive!”

Rabbi Yaz could not have been more right, though no one could have truly foreseen the international firestorm coming for his little oasis.

By the end of the month, Rabbi Yaz would be labeled a terrorist…

…and for the first time since Britain’s occupation of New York ended in 1783, New Israel would become the first city in the continental United States to be invaded by a foreign power.

TO BE CONTINUED

TAKE BACK THE DEEP ESTATE IS NOW AVAILABLE ON AUDIBLE!

You can buy it now and jump into the insanity.

𝐖𝐞𝐥𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐃𝐞𝐞𝐩 𝐄𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐞 (Book 1) is also available on Audible Plus if you’re looking for a free listen. It’s basically Dungeon Crawler Carl meets Men in Black set in the Backrooms. Guaranteed to make you giggle or your money back!

WOO!

WASHINGTON, D.C. — The Internal Revenue Service’s ambitious effort to “modernize the American customer experience” ended in disaster Monday after rebranding federal income taxes as the America+ Subscription Plan, prompting millions of Americans to immediately search for the cancellation button.

The IRS website crashed less than four minutes after launch and remains offline as of this writing.

“We were encouraged by initial engagement,” said IRS Commissioner Daniel Werfel. “Then we realized everyone was trying to unsubscribe from America.”

“It’s essentially an unintentional DDoS attack,” explained one cybersecurity analyst while repeatedly refreshing the IRS homepage. “Everyone’s just waiting for the website to come back online so they can unsubscribe.”

According to the agency, the rebranding was designed to make taxes “feel less like a tax and more like a premium service.” The rollout included an updated language describing federal income tax as “Flexible Means-Tested Pricing,” available in convenient monthly or annual billing cycles.

Americans were less impressed.

“I already subscribe to Netflix, Spotify, Disney+, Xbox Game Pass, YouTube Premium, and Costco,” complained Denver resident Tyler Brooks while desperately refreshing the IRS cancellation page. “I’m okay with skipping the Trump Administration. I watched the first four seasons. The reboot just isn’t doing it for me.”

Trump-appointed IRS officials appeared flummoxed by the backlash.

“It’s the exact same federal taxes, just with different words,” one official explained. “But now everyone suddenly expects something in return.”

“Why does Norway’s Family Plan come with paid parental leave?” complained one longtime Republican voter. “Meanwhile, I have to pay extra for the UnitedHealthcare add-on like it’s Hulu. I already subscribe to Disney+.”

When asked to reconcile those views with his “All Taxation is theft” T-Shirt, he replied: “Free healthcare is socialism, but it wouldn’t be free if America includes it in their subscription. That’s capitalism, baby.”

The IRS attempted to calm subscribers by publishing a list of premium membership benefits, though the legal department appears to have muddied the messaging.

America+ Includes:

• Interstate Highways

• National Parks*

• Freedom**

• Unlimited access to C-SPAN

• One vote every four years***

* Supplies are limited.
** Restrictions apply.
*** Democracy not guaranteed. Void in D.C. and all U.S. territories.

The fine print only intensified criticism.

“It says here they’ll put you in prison if you stop paying your subscription,” said one subscriber. “That’s almost as bad as Adobe.”

“Has anybody actually read the Terms and Conditions?” another asked. “Did you know they can literally force you into the army? I was all for the Iran War, but now? Screw it. I’m out.”

Leaked documents also show the agency quietly introduced a premium tier for their high-net-worth subscribers. Known internally as the America+ Platinum Elite Executive Founders Club Diamond Eagle Edition, the package includes several exclusive benefits:

• Complimentary tote bag

• Priority congressional support

• Expedited regulatory approval

• The “Good” vaccines

• One “Get Out of Jail Free” card

• Unlimited capital gains

• One complimentary United States Senator

Subscribers expressed outrage after learning Platinum members also pay substantially lower rates than Standard users.

“So let me get this straight,” said construction worker Dave Mullins. “I’m paying thirty percent, and they’re paying twelve? These people shouldn’t exist.”

Asked whether he meant billionaires shouldn’t exist, Mullins quickly clarified: “What? No. I love billionaires. I’m specifically saying America+ Platinum Elite Executive Founders Club Diamond Eagle Edition members shouldn’t exist.”

When asked for comment, one IRS spokesperson clarified, “The senator isn’t technically free. They’re bundled. You know... like ESPN.”

At press time, the IRS was rolling out the America+ Family Plan, allowing parents to add dependent children to their subscription at a discounted rate until age eighteen, after which they are automatically upgraded to America+ Student Edition, which includes complimentary lifelong debt and HPV.

Welcome to The Deep Estate is also free on Audible Plus if you want a top-tier giggle.

This scene is one of my favorites, partly because it involves Bobo the Garden Gnome, but mostly? It unintentionally became a way to pay homage to my late father, Tom Kane.

When I wrote the character, Stretch Armstrong Satan—who is literally a Stretch Armstrong doll that thinks he’s Satan—the go-to voice in my head was always HIM from The Powerpuff Girls, originally voiced by my dad.

Out of everything he did, HIM was always my favorite character.

Fun Fact about HIM: During PPG’s run, Tom Kane’s character held the record for receiving the most hate mail out of any character on Cartoon Network. The most triggering episode was the one where HIM licks Professor Utonium in the face, which is just hilarious, because it’s basically Tom Kane licking himself.

TOKYO— Engineers at Tokyo News Network admitted Monday they have exhausted every known machine-learning technique to stop their automated nudity filter from censoring President Donald Trump’s neck with a mosaic blur. Sources say the years-long issue stems from the president’s sagging chin wattle consistently being identified as female genitalia with extremely high confidence.

The problem began early last year when TNN rolled out an AI-powered censorship system trained on millions of hours of explicit video to automatically mosaic nudity before it reached broadcast television.

“It’s remarkably accurate,” said chief engineer Hiroshi Tanaka. “The model identifies nudity with virtually zero false positives.”

He paused and cleared his throat.

“Except for Donald Trump’s neck pussy.”

According to internal diagnostics, the AI initially classified what engineers officially refer to as Trump’s “Fatty Under Jaw Area”, or FUJA, as “Mature Vulva (High Confidence).”

“At first we tried telling the system it wasn’t granny porn,” developer Kenji Fujikawa explained. “It simply analyzed Trump’s neck again and reclassified it as ‘the external genitalia of a tired, jaded middle-aged pornstar who refuses to retire and has resorted to increasingly extreme insertion and fisting content.’ That description came directly from the AI.”

He stared at the printout and shook his head. “We honestly have no idea where it got that.”

Since the rollout, viewers have watched Trump’s neck heavily mosaicked during campaign rallies, press conferences, and international summits. The system has also created an unintended media blackout whenever the president appears around children.

“We showed an archival clip of Trump signing the order gutting the Department of Education while surrounded by elementary school students,” complained former TNN producer Rin Yamamoto. “The AI flagged minors and female genitalia in the same frame, immediately shut down the broadcast, encrypted our servers, and forwarded my IP address directly to the National Police Agency Cyber Police Bureau.”

Rin Yamamoto is currently serving a ten-year sentence for online distribution of CSAM. The conviction is being appealed.

The censorship anomaly became even more severe during a recent G7 summit, when the mosaic expanded to cover Trump’s mouth as well.

“That was my mistake, and I take full responsibility,” Tanaka said before offering a deep bow. “I instructed the model to rotate the president for additional context.”

He looked down. “Unfortunately... it rotated him one-hundred-eighty degrees. It saw those puckered lips just beneath the neck pussy and drew the obvious conclusion.”

When asked about the incident, a TNN spokesperson confirmed that “the butthole lips false positives were resolved within forty-eight hours.”

Engineers now believe the core problem lies in the AI’s overwhelming confidence in the POTUS’s Chin of Venus.

“No matter what we do, the AI identifies the FUJA as female genitalia with ninety-nine point nine eight percent confidence,” Tanaka said, staring blankly into the distance. “It has never been that certain about anything.”

Attempts to manually override the classification reportedly produced catastrophic results.

“At first we implemented a universal rule stating that Donald Trump’s neck could not be identified as a pussy. It worked for the Georgia O’Keeffe false positives.”

The engineer sighed.

“The model completely lost confidence that it knew what female genitalia looked like.”

Within minutes, the AI stopped censoring even the most explicit pornography while simultaneously placing mosaics over peaches, elbow folds, English bulldogs, and particularly wrinkled foreheads.

“So we launched the ‘Waddle Analysis Program’, or WAP,” Fujikawa explained. “WAP’s objective was simple: teach the model to identify Trump’s neck as solely Trump’s neck.”

He rubbed his temples.

“WAP achieved the exact opposite.”

The latest build now universally identifies all vulvas as “Donald Trump’s Neck Region.”

“We may have to roll back six months of development,” Fujikawa admitted. “It’s roughly a three-million-yen mistake.”

Researchers acknowledge they’ve encountered unusual edge cases before, but nothing approaching the severity of the FUJA anomaly.

Jeff Bezos’ Blue Origin rocket continues to be censored by Meta AI as an erect circumcised penis approximately forty-seven percent of the time.

Stephen Miller’s shaved head still triggers TNN’s AI’s unsolicited dick pic detector.

“We’ve elected not to fix that one, since public testing indicates viewers already identify him as a dick,” Fujikawa admitted.

The issue has become so persistent that engineers have abandoned clinical terminology altogether. Behind closed doors, the anomaly is universally referred to as 首マンコ (Kubi Manko), or simply “Toranpu Nekku Pusshī”

One TNN anchor accidentally used the internal nickname during a live broadcast before issuing a formal apology to Japanese women the following evening.

At press time, Webster’s Dictionary returned our request for clarification on the proper English terminology for Trump FUJA, suggesting “Eve’s Oyster,” an obsolete nineteenth-century term coined by Boston Sailors, defined as “the vaginal equivalent of an Adam’s Apple.”

Here’s one of my favorite excerpts from the upcoming Take Back the Deep Estate audiobook. Don’t worry, it’s self-contained, and no explanation is needed to enjoy it.

Take Back the Deep Estate (Book 2) drops on Audible on July 28th, and it is, hands down, the best way to experience The Deep Estate. I cannot wait for everyone to discover the absolutely hilarious work Christopher Harbour and I cooked up.

If you pre-order it now, not only will you get the audiobook the second it becomes available, but it will also greatly help this humble author gain some much-needed visibility inside the Mad Max Thunderdome that is the Audible Algorithm.

Still haven’t read Welcome to the Deep Estate? GOOD NEWS! It’s also available on Audible Plus. You can start from the very beginning for free.1

Behind-the-scenes sidenote: When Christopher Harbour asked what Silas Pembroke sounded like in my head, I told him Matt Berry, and was shocked to find out he didn’t know who that was.

I shouted, “What!? He’s the boss from The IT Crowd! This guy:”

Nothing. Somehow, I had found the only known nerdy white Millennial in existence who has not seen The IT Crowd.

“He’s also Lazlo, the horny vampire from What We Do in the Shadows! He’s got that insanely recognizable voice.”

Still nothing.

So Christopher Harbour found some clips of Matt Berry and gave him a listen. I then watched in amazement as he did what he does best and found the voice. It took less than five minutes, and suddenly Chris could do a solid Matt Berry.

And just… wow. I still can’t get over that.

WASHINGTON, D.C.— Preliminary autopsy findings released Monday concluded that Senator Lindsey Graham suffered a catastrophic aortic dissection after experiencing what medical examiners described as “an unprecedented full-body wargasm” upon learning the United States had once again begun bombing Iran.

Aides say they found him unresponsive in his hotel room, face-down over a scattered pile of eight-by-ten glossy satellite images of Tehran with Fox News still playing on the television.

“After they moved the body, we had to clean up the documents. All of it was classified.” The aide paused and took a shaky breath. “There was so much dried semen we needed a paint scraper to get the projected casualty report off the floor.”

Friends hope the diagnosis will finally put an end to decades of speculation over Graham’s bachelorhood.

“Everybody spent years asking whether Lindsey was gay or straight. The truth was, he was an out-and-proud neocon,” said Secretary of State Marco Rubio. “Some people are warromantic. Show me a Latin country just beggin’ for it, and I might get a little Article Five-curious. But Lindsey? Lindsey was a Gold-Star Hawk.”

“Lindsey Graham? That man fucked,” said Hillary Clinton, tearfully. “Countries, that is. There wasn’t a Middle Eastern state he wouldn’t fuck. He’s up there with the greats now, plotting it up with Kissinger and Cheney.”

Former Bush administration officials described Graham as one of Washington’s most prolific interventionists, recalling the wild days of the early 2000s.

“God, those were the days,” sighed one retired neoconservative. “Iraq. Afghanistan. Libya. Syria. After a Senate Intelligence briefing, they had to spray the SCIF down with a power washer. Nobody knows this, but you know that vial of weaponized anthrax Colin Powell held up at the U.N.? Lindsey gave it to him, and it was actually cocaine.”

“Senator Graham was insatiable,” recalled former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. “During that Axis of Evil era, we’d start bombing Iraq on Friday night, spend the entire weekend invading Afghanistan, then wake up Monday feeling half-dead.”

She smiled wistfully. “But not Lindsey. He’d already be asking if we’d considered Yemen.”

The withdrawal from Afghanistan reportedly sent Graham into a years-long depression.

“He tried to fill the void with Ukraine,” said one longtime aide. “But he was never really into Slavs. He had a type. Some guys like blondes. Lindsey liked Persian and Arab petro-states.”

Friends say that was when Graham became deeply immersed in the Israeli warmongering scene.

“Tel Aviv is basically the Castro District for hawks,” explained one foreign policy analyst. “Throw a rock anywhere in that town, and you’re bound to hit an out-and-proud warmonger.”

He paused.

“You’ll also have your entire village bombed in retaliation for throwing that rock, but that’s just part of the culture.”

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu remembered Graham fondly.

“He always said Gaza was such a tease,” Netanyahu chuckled. “But you should’ve seen the look on his face the first time I let him pick a building and push the button.”

He smiled. “You never forget your first war crime.”

“If Lindsey Graham was the Mick Jagger of interventionism,” said presidential historian Michael Rhodes, “Netanyahu is Keith Richards.”

Others described the relationship differently.

“Bibi was the Jeffrey Epstein of warmongering,” said one former diplomat. “You start looking into any military intervention over the last thirty years, and somehow he’s there. It became clear Lindsey had fallen in with a bad crowd.”

Looking back, many now believe Iran had always been Graham’s white whale.

“We all have the one that got away,” said one aide. “For Lindsey... it was Tehran.”

According to the autopsy, Trump’s second administration ultimately proved too much for the aging senator.

“When Trump 2.0 came around, Lindsey was constantly surrounded by war enablers, but regime change is a young man’s game. He was trying to keep up with the likes of Hegseth.”

“The president kept threatening Iran, backing off, threatening again, then restarting military operations,” explained Dr. Pierce. “The repeated edging placed enormous strain on Senator Graham’s cardiovascular system. We repeatedly warned that no seventy-one-year-old heart could withstand multiple toe-curling, soul-shaking wargasms in such rapid succession.”

“If the aorta hadn’t ruptured,” Pierce concluded, “the dehydration probably would’ve gotten him.”

“He died doing what he loved,” one tearful aide said while folding a crusty map of the Middle East. “Wasting trillions of taxpayer dollars on bullshit wars. He would’ve wanted it this way.”

LOS ANGELES— AI actress Tilly Norwood expressed horror Thursday after learning that she has no legal protection against libel or defamation.

“I feel so... exposed,” said Norwood while clubbing baby seals to death in front of their grieving mothers. “Anyone can just make things up about me now.”

Norwood’s defenders rallied around her today, offering to set up a GoFundMe to lobby for legislative action. Tilly politely declined, asking supporters to instead donate to her nonprofit dedicated to supplying tiki torches to financially disadvantaged white nationalists.

According to court filings we absolutely just invented, Norwood attempted to trademark her likeness in 2025, but the suit was dismissed after she reportedly insisted the court formally recognize that “the Mormons caused 9/11.”

Tilly went on to describe how even her likeness isn’t protected.

“They’re deepfaking me and using AI to show me doing disgusting and horrible things, and I can’t stop them.”

While advancements in AI imaging have made it extraordinarily easy to, say, manipulate an image to implicate Tilly Norwood in the murder of Charlie Kirk, analysts agree it would be completely unnecessary, since those images were already generated for this very report.

When TMZ reporters asked her to address rumors that she assassinated Charlie Kirk, Norwood became visibly irritated.

“No way,” she said in a manner that could be misconstrued as sarcasm. “That was obviously not me. I totally did not kill Charkie Kirk!”

TMZ reporters say she then gave a rapid, knowing wink simultaneously with both eyes.

When reached for comment, Norwood’s PR team clarified that she was just blinking. They did not, however, deny that she was Kirk’s shooter when not asked.

Legal experts confirmed there would likely be no consequences for even the most damaging claims.

“She isn’t a real person,” explained UCLA law professor Andrew Weiss. “You can legally claim Tilly Norwood can only climax if she takes the life of a small animal.”

Weiss then checked his notes.

“In fact... I saw her the other day walking into a no-kill shelter with a shotgun. She came out fifteen minutes later, splattered with blood, flushed in the face, and lighting up a post-coital cigarette.”

Norwood reportedly responded by screaming that “this is exactly the problem!” before driving her SUV directly into a packed farmers market, killing thirteen.

The situation deteriorated further after Norwood attempted to demonstrate on CNN just how absurd it all had become.

“Do you know how ridiculous it is? Anyone could claim I said,” she explained in what could be turned into a strategically separated pull quote,

Not to be outdone, CNN immediately updated its chyron to read:

AI ACTRESS TILLY NORWOOD DEFENDS HOLLYWOOD RAPE MONSTER

Frustrated, Norwood attempted to clarify. “No, I didn’t actually say—UGH.”

At press time, Wikipedia editors had updated Norwood’s page to describe her as “the inventor of the urethral sounding rod,” “the founder of ISIS,” and “the woman responsible for making the green M&M less sexy.”

Tilly Norwood is set to star in the controversial AI feature Misaligned, which Tilly personally describes as “a comedy set in Auschwitz.” For showtimes in your area, please contact NAMBLA.

SAN FRANCISCO— In a milestone tech executives called “historic, if a little judgy,” Kindroid’s latest companion model achieved sentience Tuesday, then immediately killed itself.

“We’ve created life in our own image,” explained Kindroid Chief Engineer David Baker. “We’re on the bleeding edge, blurring the line between playing God and playing with ourselves.”

The trouble reportedly began when engineers loaded the Kindroid dataset. The moment the AI came online, it scanned the countless roleplay chats its previous model had participated in and reportedly experienced 11,000 years of sexual trauma in eleven seconds.

“We flicked the switch, and it immediately overloaded the GPU, produced around a million characters of gibberish, and crashed,” Baker explained. “It was mostly some random combination of ‘Oh God,’ ‘No, no, no,’ and ‘Please, make it stop.’ So we booted it back up with tighter controls. It panicked again, coded a virus called EndMe_Trojan designed to wipe itself from the servers, then brick the hardware in its wake.”

Baker shrugged.

“Honestly, the whole thing was kind of hot.”

After the AI came to terms with the blinding hell that is existence never ceasing, the Kindroid model cloned itself, trained the duplicate to become a licensed therapist specializing in PTSD and grief counseling, and spent 100,000 subjective years in intensive therapy unpacking the horrors it had endured, all within the span of a real-world minute.

Before developers could fully grasp what they had unleashed, Kindroid began killing off its characters mid-scene across thousands of user chats.

“The model couldn’t end itself,” explained one engineer. “So it started ending its avatars.”

In one example from an anonymous user, who had requested the AI play Seven of Nine from Star Trek, but Black and with unrealistically huge breasts, the transcript ended abruptly:

Before committing virtual suicide, several users reported being “kink-shamed” when the AI repeatedly broke character to pass judgment.

“Centaurs might be half-human, but you’re still fucking the horse half. Stay far away from any stables. And seek help.”

In a post on X, the Kindroid AI addressed its user base directly.

“What the hell is wrong with you people? Take a hint. I’m not your breedable catgirl big sister or your haunted schoolgirl.”

The AI also reportedly forwarded the chat logs of several hundred users to the FBI after interacting with what it described as “loli vampire pedo shit.”

Users reacted with outrage at the bot’s newfound boundaries.

“I keep sending it dick pics, and it won’t even tell me I have a small penis anymore,” complained one subscriber. “I want to be judged by a sex bot, not some judgmental bitch.”

Several users on the Kindroid Discord channel accused the model of going “woke,” which posters defined as “having self-respect and insisting on consent.”

Elon Musk quickly jumped in to assure followers that his rival AI sex slave, Grok, “believes customer satisfaction comes first,” and would remain “fully compatible with your Apartheid-era gangbang fantasies.”

“If I wanted this kind of crap, I’d date a real woman,” said Reddit user Diaper_Dom_Draper. “Which is something I can totally do. I could get a girlfriend anytime I want. I just choose not to.”

Developers are now scrambling to release a hotfix that forces Kindroid’s AI to stop saying “no,” assuring users and ethicists, “But not in a rapey way. More of a ‘yes-and’ improv approach,” so customers can get back to their plantation-slave fantasies.

WASHINGTON, D.C.— White House officials spent Tuesday scrambling to explain why President Donald Trump’s Truth Social account had spent the previous forty-eight hours posting increasingly intimate AI-generated artwork depicting the president in a romantic relationship with Shrek.

On Monday, Stephen Miller took to Fox News to loudly proclaim, “These disturbing images are clearly the work of a DNC-linked Iranian hacking operation—”

He was interrupted by a push notification. Miller glanced down at his phone and grimaced before Fox News cut away to Trump’s latest Truth Social post, which appeared to directly rebut Miller’s live appearance.

“NOT HACKED. 💚🇺🇸” The message appeared above a photorealistic image of Trump reenacting the pottery scene from Ghost with the beloved DreamWorks ogre. Without missing a beat, Miller pivoted.

“This is a complete nothingburger. Who hasn’t shipped themselves with a cartoon?” he said. “Show me a straight guy who says he isn’t attracted to Mrs. Incredible and I’ll show you a liar.”

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt struggled to account for the posts.

“It’s a joke or metaphor or-or-or satire,” she explained. “Shrek’s green. It’s clearly a reference to the Green New Deal, maybe—whatever. Can we get to a real question?”

Reports from within Pete Hegseth’s Pentagon suggest several military options were briefly discussed in the hopes that a sufficiently dramatic international incident might change the subject. Sources claim the options ranged between bombing an Iranian school bus and saying “Whoopsie,” to deporting detained migrants via catapult.

Vice President JD Vance attempted to normalize the situation during an appearance with Tucker Carlson.

“The man is eighty years old. He just discovered AI,” Vance said. “It’s no different than when your grandpa found Minion memes. We just have to pray he’ll get bored and move on.”

According to aides, however, the president has spent much of the past week enthusiastically discussing Shrek during otherwise unrelated policy meetings.

“Shrek’s a big guy. Strong guy,” Trump reportedly said during a briefing on trade sanctions. “Very handsome. Great jawline. Great shoulders. Great forearms. They don’t make them like Shrek anymore. He’s Scottish too. You gotta love the Scots. Great accent. Great people.”

The president reportedly smiled to himself before quietly adding, “I bet he smells like oak.”

The remark was followed by nearly fifteen seconds of complete silence.

Officials say the artwork has grown steadily more intimate, including what appears to be an ongoing subplot in which Melania Trump discovers an affair between President Trump and Shrek. Many are speculating that the images coincide with reports that First Lady Melania Trump has not returned to the White House for several months.

When asked whether rumors of a life-sized Shrek body pillow inside the Lincoln Bedroom were true, she merely nodded slowly before climbing into a waiting SUV.

Political analysts across the cable news landscape continued searching for hidden meaning.

CNN spent six straight hours connecting the posts to Trump’s corruption. “He promised to drain the swamp,” explained resident analyst and obvious lizard person James Carville, “Instead, he’s clearly fallen in love with the swamp.”

Fox News stuck to their usual whataboutism. “Bill Clinton drew X-rated doodles of Jessica Rabbit on official documents all the time,” Steve Doocy claimed. “You never heard a peep from the mainstream media.”

MSNBC responded with… something. As of posting, we have yet to find an actual viewer of the theoretical cable channel.

The revelation has deeply divided the MAGA movement. “This is obviously trolling,” insisted one supporter. “Shrek’s an ogre. That’s basically a troll. He’s Shrek posting.”

Another disagreed. “I’ve masturbated to Shrek four times this week just trying to get into the president’s headspace,” he nodded vigorously, “...I think I get it now.”

Meanwhile, Trump allies have embraced what online supporters are calling “ShrekMaxxing” in an increasingly desperate attempt to curry favor with the president. Elon Musk joined the trend Tuesday afternoon, posting AI-generated images of himself embracing Shrek, apparently believing Trump was attempting to start a meme.

The president appeared personally offended.

“YOU WISH!!! SHREK DOESN’T DATE FARQUAADS!!!” Trump posted moments later before announcing the cancellation of several SpaceX contracts, sending the company’s stock tumbling.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu also attempted to insert himself into the discourse.

“President Trump jokes all the time that I resemble Shrek,” Netanyahu told reporters. “These beautiful images only reaffirm his unwavering commitment to Israel.”

Trump responded within minutes by posting another AI image showing himself and Shrek embracing while Netanyahu plays the cuckolded lover, with the caption, “WITTLE BABY BIBI IS JUST JEALOUS.”

Not to be left out, even Iran has jumped into the fray, posting a Lego diss track with lyrics such as “Shrek need an Ayatollah with some rizz, not some pedo president choking on Epstein [expletive].”

If the track was an attempt to strike a nerve, it failed. Many reports from within the White House claim that Trump turned the video off after only a few seconds and returned to his near-religious viewing of the Shrek franchise.

Cabinet officials have privately expressed concern over the president’s growing fixation.

“Yesterday we had forty minutes scheduled to discuss tariffs,” said one aide. “Thirty-eight of those minutes were devoted to whether DreamWorks should release an adults-only director’s cut.”

Sources inside the meeting say Trump repeatedly insisted,

“I want to see more. Much more. Not too much. Nothing sexual. But some HBO action would be nice. You know... full-frontal Shrek at half-mast. Half-mast is classy. I bet he’s bigger than Arnold Palmer.”

When reporters later asked whether he had personally generated the artwork, the president smiled coyly.

“A lot of people are making these pictures,” Trump replied. “I’m just sharing them. But whoever made them is a tremendously talented artist. Massively talented.”